Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Asunto: NEWS Sokker- big changes are coming!
My number of letters in My name is 6-9-6..... I want two chicks ^^ dont know how a 696 is though :p
Fif? :-P
696 thats three men :D (just came up with it to tease you a little)
696 thats three men :D (just came up with it to tease you a little)
Dtox69 trga adaca
Now everything makes sense.
Trga claims to have a transgender bf and a pansexual gf
Now everything makes sense.
Trga claims to have a transgender bf and a pansexual gf
Instead of tax change, would be better if Sokker limits max amount of players in a team. Users like could you not bid this player and others have over 60 players.
Tax reform basically killed new users to her better in the game. Their only chance to make money now it’s totally limited to train around 2 seasons to get profit.
Plus, sponsor’s money sucks and does not allow you to survive week by week assuming you don’t have great expenses.
I don’t want to talk about the new supporters system because I’m sure more people will agree with me that it also modified the incomes per match played at home just because you’re not having the best performance during season.
Tax reform basically killed new users to her better in the game. Their only chance to make money now it’s totally limited to train around 2 seasons to get profit.
Plus, sponsor’s money sucks and does not allow you to survive week by week assuming you don’t have great expenses.
I don’t want to talk about the new supporters system because I’m sure more people will agree with me that it also modified the incomes per match played at home just because you’re not having the best performance during season.
Limit on players would not solve (fast)traders. And that was what the reform tried to solve.
While i think it not a bad idea per se. I think that they should first implement some changes that make people happy and then they can piss them off a bit.
I dont remember a change that would make the people happy. The only positive change was reworking flash to HTML5, but again that was to save the game, did not bring any benefit for the users.
While i think it not a bad idea per se. I think that they should first implement some changes that make people happy and then they can piss them off a bit.
I dont remember a change that would make the people happy. The only positive change was reworking flash to HTML5, but again that was to save the game, did not bring any benefit for the users.
Daytrade can be also limited in buying a certain amount of players per season. So this will make users choose carefully what they buy and when.
If devs need money to make this game survive and implement more stuff, they should make an discount in Plus account. So users will think about in buying Plus or not. I’m about to expire my Plus account and I’m not sure if I’ll renew my subscription.
Tax reform basically killed new users to her better in the game. Their only chance to make money now it’s totally limited to train around 2 seasons to get profit.
I think 95%+ new users DON'T trade players every 4 weeks, only those that already played the game and start massive trading instantly to improve fast by making profit on price differences.
I don't see a problem in promoting longer term training (1.5 season training gives you roughly the same tax as before, 1% difference) instead of buying under the market price and selling on/over the market price.
I agree though that for some time all the changes they make are NEGATIVE in a way that they make some people angry, while not making anyone particularly happy. I tried convincing Raul that while some of the negative changes are needed, they should also add/change this that are positive for the users and not making them feel punished or limited, but I don't think he agrees.
I think 95%+ new users DON'T trade players every 4 weeks, only those that already played the game and start massive trading instantly to improve fast by making profit on price differences.
I don't see a problem in promoting longer term training (1.5 season training gives you roughly the same tax as before, 1% difference) instead of buying under the market price and selling on/over the market price.
I agree though that for some time all the changes they make are NEGATIVE in a way that they make some people angry, while not making anyone particularly happy. I tried convincing Raul that while some of the negative changes are needed, they should also add/change this that are positive for the users and not making them feel punished or limited, but I don't think he agrees.
Agree with you.
Promise is like updating an old car with new stuffs... You remove first the old stuffs, e.g radio unit, and old speakers, and now they add the new radio but still not speakers.....
So yes, implementation is going so slow that services seems downgraded
Promise is like updating an old car with new stuffs... You remove first the old stuffs, e.g radio unit, and old speakers, and now they add the new radio but still not speakers.....
So yes, implementation is going so slow that services seems downgraded
PLUS is already a more than reasonable price. It hasn't changed in over a decade. I'd even pay more for it (not a ton, but some more).
If folks don't honestly see the value in PLUS as it stands, then I don't know what to tell you. I have tried out two other soccer games like this. One the price for "pro" is outlandishly high. So much so, that I would never consider buying it. The other I also am a "pro" member, it's better than sokker in a few ways, but sokker's match engine and tactical abilities far outstrip this 'other' game I play.
I just really enjoy building my own team there with my own youth (imagine that!). Not really a thing, here. Training coordination makes it too difficult to do , while still playing competitively.
If folks don't honestly see the value in PLUS as it stands, then I don't know what to tell you. I have tried out two other soccer games like this. One the price for "pro" is outlandishly high. So much so, that I would never consider buying it. The other I also am a "pro" member, it's better than sokker in a few ways, but sokker's match engine and tactical abilities far outstrip this 'other' game I play.
I just really enjoy building my own team there with my own youth (imagine that!). Not really a thing, here. Training coordination makes it too difficult to do , while still playing competitively.
Well you from USA can earn a yearly subscription for like 1-2 hours, but there are managers from other countries who need one or two days of work...
Here we say "sirotinjo, i Bogu si teska" :D
Here we say "sirotinjo, i Bogu si teska" :D
Yeah, they youth school is kinda a bummer here. In other game, football-strategy, I was able to easily rely only on my youth school and still reach a very high level using only my own youths. That was a step too far, but it would be much nicer if it was possible to have at least 4 own youths at a very high level.
But they would have to redo the youth school a lot to make that happen, possibly reducing the low/top outliers so that it would be much easier to get a very good-but not great own youth. Maybe some kind of extra training bonus for own youth players as well.
But they would have to redo the youth school a lot to make that happen, possibly reducing the low/top outliers so that it would be much easier to get a very good-but not great own youth. Maybe some kind of extra training bonus for own youth players as well.
but it would be much nicer if it was possible to have at least 4 own youths at a very high level.
over what period of time?
over what period of time?
At the same point, so with an age difference lower than 4 (for example 27 youngest, 30 oldest)