Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Asunto: www.sktables.org - Enhance Your Sokker Experience!
Nobody listens to him. If nobody answers him and the thread just continues its normal life, it will end faster and workless...
this thread is for a great tool! i cant belive mods allow this conversation please clean the topic and leave the thread clean for the tool
To get back on topic and provide constructive feedback, I cannot understand how SkTable can certify such talent Talent: 3~3.3 ✓ considering the potential coach wrong estimation at the entry and the entry / exit level / nb of week. Are you really sure your certifications are working well ?
(editado)
(editado)
I agree. I was really excited to use this feature, I was tracking a certified divine youth pull, which then dropped. Some work is certainly needed in that area.
I love the tool, don't get me wrong, but I thought it was doing something that it wasn't.
On this basis, it would be great to have a column that shows how many weeks the junior had been in the school. That way I can quickly determine how accurate the talent estimation is likely to be.
I love the tool, don't get me wrong, but I thought it was doing something that it wasn't.
On this basis, it would be great to have a column that shows how many weeks the junior had been in the school. That way I can quickly determine how accurate the talent estimation is likely to be.
I ve already answered you. This junior will certainly randoms up and training up in 3 weeks max, it s most predictable.
You still feint to not understand, or at best you are really strange to use a tool that you don’t trust.
(editado)
You still feint to not understand, or at best you are really strange to use a tool that you don’t trust.
(editado)
I'm not talking about potential randoms - I tend to agree with you - but about certifying talent.
It does seem a little “presumptuous” to grant such certification when the talent can just as easily be very good as bad.
Iit might maybe make more sense to grant the certification only in cases where the talent is truly determined with certainty by sktable.
This would certainly “sacrifice” the juniors staying too few weeks in the center, but it would also perhaps give more credit to this certification.
At the moment, I notice a little too much variance.
(editado)
It does seem a little “presumptuous” to grant such certification when the talent can just as easily be very good as bad.
Iit might maybe make more sense to grant the certification only in cases where the talent is truly determined with certainty by sktable.
This would certainly “sacrifice” the juniors staying too few weeks in the center, but it would also perhaps give more credit to this certification.
At the moment, I notice a little too much variance.
(editado)