Asunto: NEWS Sokker- big changes are coming!

You severly injured your opponent's opponent! :-p

;)))

It's a wrong platform to do promo for Sokker.

actually it's a very good platform, because no sane person will think that children (under 16) for example from TikTok will want to play this game

you need to target 25+ people, possibly older...

Show me the last game you watched where ONE team was awarded three penalties in the same game, and the opponent didn't have any.
No, I watch a ton of football in the premier league and. It doesn't happen. It's rare to have two penalties in one game.
(editado)

Yesterday, Antwerp - Eupen 2 penalties for antwerp, both scored ;-)

Valencia - Real Madrid 4:1. 3 penalties for Valencia all converted.
Here is an article about it
Was not that long ago, you asked me about matches that i actually watched.

In 1999 there was a match where 5 penalties were awarded Argentina - Colombia in Copa America. Looked like a sokker match, because 3 were missed. Although that is still better percentage than on sokker.

In lower leagues that happens more often. There was even a greek goalkeeper that scored a penalty hattrick in 4th Greek League in 2022.

In real life, missing two penalties in a match is very, very unlikely. It occurs every 5-10 years. but I see it in this game at least 5 times every season. The biggest problem with this game is the match engine. But they don't and won't fix it. At least they should fix these penalties. I don't want to take penalties anymore because I know there won't be a goal. My penalty statistic in my team and National team
%35 goal
%65 missed

In regards too

ONE team was awarded three penalties in the same game

I remember Brazil beating Argentina with a hattrick of penalties scored by the better Ronaldo, all from actual PKs (as in, no doubts they were all fouls) in WC06 qualifiers iirc, to add to the Soler hattrick BlueZero mentioned. Definitely rare, but far more common than the "penalty scored ratio" SK got us used too.

It’s because the scoring ratio in sokker is lower on purpose, otherwise you would either get boring games where nothing happens or you would have hockey scores like 7:4, 9:2 every game (there are still too many of those anyway)

It’s just a stupid game, you are totally overanalysing it

One could adjust the probability o scoring for penalties, not that big deal. Probably one IF.

You can also adjust probability of scoring 1v1 etc. and then end up with 10:4 results.

If you spike only the penalty probability, then suddenly penalties will be by far the best chance for scoring the goals, while being a very random factor (it's mostly about luck whether you get a penalty or whether you concede one)

not a good idea in my opinion

There are more 1v1 in a match than penalties.
But we are both free to have an opinion.

DEV's wont do shit about it anyway :-).

There are more 1v1 in a match than penalties.
But we are both free to have an opinion.

you don't understand what I write about...

yes, there are more 1v1, but they ALSO, like penalties, have much lower scoring chance than penalties in RL

so if you boost ONLY penalties to 75% then the scoring ratio from penalties vs 1v1 etc. will be stupid...

and if you boost BOTH then you suddenly get crazy results...

I do understand.

But i suggest only to make the penalties probability higher, not 1v1.
The results would not change that much.

If we start adjusting 1v1, then we can adjust stupid passes, backpasses, injuries and so on.
Basically the match engine is so bad that we want to rework it all?

But i suggest only to make the penalties probability higher, not 1v1.
The results would not change that much.

again, this would make penalties - which are VERY random and you have no impact on them - too important in comparison to other ways of scoring

agree to disagree?