Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Asunto: NEWS Sokker- big changes are coming!
You're assuming I'd even have a winger.
Putting a winger into defensive midfield is a risk. The reason they're wingers is because they typically don't have defending to play in that slot. You could just sub in a proper midfielder.
Defensive mid into defence is doable.
You've still got a striker playing wing though. Or somewhere in midfield.
(editado)
Putting a winger into defensive midfield is a risk. The reason they're wingers is because they typically don't have defending to play in that slot. You could just sub in a proper midfielder.
Defensive mid into defence is doable.
You've still got a striker playing wing though. Or somewhere in midfield.
(editado)
Are there any countries, even outside of the World Cup qualifiers, with 0 or at most one user. Why not combine these 2 or 4 countries and create a competitive league?
It was considered and noone said definetly "no" to that idea, but... There would always be a question where is the limit. How many users do country need to have its own league? What should be done if in one of the countries in "combined" league number of users would increase? Should we remove that country and create teir own country league again? What with promotions and relegations? Or what should be done if in one of the countries with own league number of users would decrease? Should we move that teams to combined worldwide league? Should all start from the lowest league and why? How to convince people in country with X users, that they have too many users and they need X-1 to be moved to combined league?
There are so many questions and there are no "simple" solutions.
The match formation section has been modified several times with big updates. Would it be difficult to add a third tactic as an optional feature?
I don't know if third tactic is possible to add, probably it is possible.
But:
- more tactics = more options, but how many users will use it? I'm sure for now notmore that 5% uses two tactics in a single match
- maybe trying to achieve something with two tactics is more difficult, more challenging, than having three? Having three tactics would make the opponent more unpredictable. We need a balance between predictability and unpredictability and I think two tactics are better for that (but that's only my opinion)
It was considered and noone said definetly "no" to that idea, but... There would always be a question where is the limit. How many users do country need to have its own league? What should be done if in one of the countries in "combined" league number of users would increase? Should we remove that country and create teir own country league again? What with promotions and relegations? Or what should be done if in one of the countries with own league number of users would decrease? Should we move that teams to combined worldwide league? Should all start from the lowest league and why? How to convince people in country with X users, that they have too many users and they need X-1 to be moved to combined league?
There are so many questions and there are no "simple" solutions.
The match formation section has been modified several times with big updates. Would it be difficult to add a third tactic as an optional feature?
I don't know if third tactic is possible to add, probably it is possible.
But:
- more tactics = more options, but how many users will use it? I'm sure for now notmore that 5% uses two tactics in a single match
- maybe trying to achieve something with two tactics is more difficult, more challenging, than having three? Having three tactics would make the opponent more unpredictable. We need a balance between predictability and unpredictability and I think two tactics are better for that (but that's only my opinion)
In my opinion, training and competing should not be mutual exclusive. Everyone could train and compete. Maybe a u-23 league instead of this junior league. Or any other idea. It would be pointless to have a farming team if you could train and also compete.