Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Asunto: »General Questions

2024-07-06 15:00:32
How old are you?

You're coming with an issue

I'm giving you an answer how to try to fix it because it's 100% a problem on your side

your response is "XDDD"
2024-07-06 15:13:55
This poor man just lost +9m "for free"?

https://sokker.org/player/PID/38834085

Stupendous sokka!!!
2024-07-06 15:15:53
Yes, he didn’t know about the new taxes.

Possibly there should be info about the new tax in the „confirm window”
2024-07-06 16:09:09
yeah, that is a good idea, some kind of 'I have read this, I understand and accept whatever is going to happen' and unless someone click that "confirmation" he/she has pressroom article unread

could also be some kind of new popup window, blocking the page until someone click "confirmation" but I am not sure if such kind of informing would be better, could be a little intrusive
2024-07-06 16:09:50
Not really, it's an ill-advised move from the game.

It's turning shit and less enjoyable than before for everyone.

Borkos, was he trying to day trade or competing, huh?
(editado)
2024-07-06 16:15:58
They have to limit taking advantage of market by mass trading. They should encourage long term training and playing for results and it's hard to do that without limiting the fast transfers by higher taxes.

I bought a 16yo for 400k euro and after 4 weeks I already could have gotten over 5m euro for him. That's crazy and it shouldn't work this way so such limiting is needed IMO.
It's far too easy to make money on fast transfers and 4-week training cycles.

There were also users who bough lots of players under their market value and then re-sold them without even training for higher prices.

Borkos, was he trying to day trade or competing, huh?

you can't make rules for every exception and judge the idea by one example
(editado)
2024-07-06 16:20:33
No bro no, implementing things wrong also has unwanted results!

Tax the benefit!!! It's 1st of economía mate


By attacking "traders" they have now f*cked everyone haha
2024-07-06 16:22:07
Ah, I see you're one of the traders with almost 250m euro profit and over 550m euro income on transfers in 4 years... no wonder you don't like the tax changes

I bought 496 players in 19 years, you bought 654 in 4 years... tell me that's normal and how the game should work, it's crazy.
2024-07-06 16:23:17
They should encourage long term training and playing for results and it's hard to do that without limiting the fast transfers by higher taxes.


Yeah let's dictate everyone how to play a GAME!
2024-07-06 16:24:41
Taxing the benefit would also not be fair for users who bought a 16yo and then trained him for 10 seasons.

I do think that it would be better if 28+ players were treated easily with taxes, BUT on the other hand is it fair that the rich can just buy a top player for 4 weeks when they need him [due to cards/injuries] and then just sell him?

Another problem is that some users trade also on older players, because it's also easy to get one for low price and then sell him for x times more
2024-07-06 16:25:32
Yeah let's dictate everyone how to play a GAME!

It already was dictated. The only/best route to success was massive trading. And that was bad for the game, still is.

And the whole point is that the game should give MANY routes and ways to success, now there is only the trading/fast training route.
(editado)
2024-07-06 16:26:15
Ahh yeah the same ild tale you have to come up with every time so that it conditions my posture. Heck yeah haha!!

Most of my trades have been over a season or almost 2. So I'm sorry for that :(

Dude are you reading the forums? Cause I don't see traders complaining...I see normal users and new users
2024-07-06 16:27:32
I just came today to expose the silly situation that happened to your polish colleague!
2024-07-06 16:29:24
Taxing the benefit would also not be fair for users who bought a 16yo and then trained him for 10 seasons.

Would it not be clearly more fair than what's currently going on?? In 10 season he barely won't pay any tax what do you mean?
2024-07-06 16:32:09
Please write your exact idea for the taxes, because it's hard to talk when you just shout general ideas. First you wrote about "income tax" now you're writing about "income tax changing over time".

Most of my trades have been over a season or almost 2. So I'm sorry for that :(

which season? because only in May you had 23 transfers :)
2024-07-06 16:35:34
Ahhh you also count the cheap old players!? Hahaha
Do you also count the huge huge amount of 1€ players I bought at the beginning to not pay their salaries in 5th division (at the very beginning)

Are you also ridiculously adding those to the bag?

Can you read? Tax the benefit. Many have also said it. It simply makes much more sense :)