Asunto: »General Questions

Let me remind your post:

adaca à nerozurro
I had a talent 4,5 with lvl 9 coach in the beggining under old junior school... maybe that can guide you a little

So as The_Ripper wrote

Max coach level is 16,2:, so it could be like this if we assume it's linear:
16,2 - 3,0 max
15,2 - 3,2 max
14,2 - 3,4 max
13.2 - 3,6 max
12.2 - 3,8 max
11.2 - 4,0 max
10.2 - 4,2 max
9.2 - 4,4 max


maybe that can guide you a little :)

Hmm maybe you right

HI! I would like to share a comment to see if you know what is happening or if it is just me-

I played sokker many years ago, I played from 2007 to 2014.. Now I camee back a few months ago... And something that catches my attention is the following:



In my previous time, when I put the mouse over the player, I got the white box with the name and percentage, now when my mouse is on any other side of the screen I get the white box, but not when it is on top of the player . This happens to me since I returned to the sokker, does it happen to you too? Was it always like this for you?

Here also...no white boxes when I'm hovering over the field or the players, but then when I circle around my club logo, all players starts popping up white boxes with %

After changes they added this randomized feature.

Yeah. It happens to everybody, so basically hoovering doesn't work
(editado)

What a pity

It is impossible for me to pick the an unearthly coach... Will the effectivity of the training be better if I change magical assistant to magical assistant with better skills and higher salary?

Marginal... I have 2 lvl 14 Assistant and a lvl 15 ... had for ages, never had problem with great talents

If you have 2 coaches with exactly the same individual skill levels, yes, a higher salary means more subskills.
But otherwise it can means that higher salary coach has more unbalanced skills

I think similar to adaca

Well… after this change the asistent in training report shows me that the effectivity of training is 92%...
And it used to be 88% before....

I don't know if it isn't just bug... But 4% aren't so marginal to me

don't mix up training effectivity of trainers with general training effectivity

So assistants have only impact to general training?

No. What mauser means is that you shouldn't mix up these two following things, which are different kinds of "effectiveness":

- The effectiveness depends on the number of minutes played in the week before training (the preceding Thursday to Wednesday) in official, friendly and national team matches.
This part describes what is being shown on the training page, which is what you spoke of

- The real increase in a players skills depends on the coaching staff, with the value of the coached skill with the head coach having the greatest influence, followed by the sum of the overall level of the assistant coaches.

Yes but a really light effect

"Username" has proposed you a pact.



what is it?

It's an old feature, you can check your friends by clicking on your own username (link)