Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Asunto: goalkeeper injured after three substitution
- 1
- 2
VITAS68 [del] para
Todos
In this match :
https://sokker.org/comment?matchID=39904509
my goalkeeper got injured after I have made yet three substitution, so my goal-line was left without protection.
It's simply ridiculous...
https://sokker.org/comment?matchID=39904509
my goalkeeper got injured after I have made yet three substitution, so my goal-line was left without protection.
It's simply ridiculous...
No it's not. It IS ridiculous.
3 subs when irl 5 is standard
irl the game will not continue until a fieldplayer takes the position of GK when the injury or suspention occurs when all subs are done.
3 subs when irl 5 is standard
irl the game will not continue until a fieldplayer takes the position of GK when the injury or suspention occurs when all subs are done.
fornado para
VITAS68 [del]
What is really ridiculous is that you got only 1 goal scored by your opp during a time without a goalkeeper!!
But yes, this is a bug, which is so rare that was never fixed since 2004 ;)
But yes, this is a bug, which is so rare that was never fixed since 2004 ;)
But it's not a problem if you set min 1 ... red card or no player ... on position 1: and a field player will keep the goal like in RL
sorry mate, but in my whole lifetime this problem never occured, so it would be really annoying and waste of time to set every game this setting.
Also there is too less room to make every setting, Now I usually have problem to do it because you need to set for defenders this red card or no player and I like to set "If winning by 2 goals..."etc thing, so no space to make all decisions you want in the game, this would occupy one more slot
Also there is too less room to make every setting, Now I usually have problem to do it because you need to set for defenders this red card or no player and I like to set "If winning by 2 goals..."etc thing, so no space to make all decisions you want in the game, this would occupy one more slot
VITAS68 [del] para
mauser
But if I set one conditional order as you say, if that field player got injured before the goalkeeper, anyway I have the problem, so this isn't the solution.
This could be solved partially with a set order instead a conditional order, we can designate a penalty kick and free kick player, we could add also one player to go as gk in case of injury and no more subs available, if you leave that order in blank, game will assign the nearest player to the point where the injury occurred, just like with free kicks.
But devs and some users say it's not an urgent issue (being sarcastic here)
dasanchez86 para
silvercard21
But it isn't urgent to be honest.
It is not that common.
--
What one may think is "this is an easy fix", so no wonder why not implemented, but no really urgency here.
It is not that common.
--
What one may think is "this is an easy fix", so no wonder why not implemented, but no really urgency here.
Royal Flush para
dasanchez86
It has always been like this?
I have always taken this into account, not to perform 3 substitutes at, let's say, minute 45.
The earliest I would let a 3rd substitute happen is at minute 75.
But yes, it should be fixed, not a priority.
Definitely if you know the other things that still need to happen or improve
I have always taken this into account, not to perform 3 substitutes at, let's say, minute 45.
The earliest I would let a 3rd substitute happen is at minute 75.
But yes, it should be fixed, not a priority.
Definitely if you know the other things that still need to happen or improve
silvercard21 para
nerozurro
Then it's sh1t happens, since these are football rules. 3 subs is old and needs to be updated. + on the bench why not hving 10 players, to have a wider choice, i don't see issues with it. Moreover it's very realistic and part of football.
- 1
- 2