You talk about combination, series, statistics, but have you ever tried to confront your theories and algorithms ?

Seriously, how can we trust your tool when adding an extra level to this junior on week 0 gives us so much discrepancies in % accuracy and talent estimation (86% & 3-3.3 with certified talend vs 19% & 3-5+) ? We are not talking here about marginal but very high variation.

And don't you see that 4 ups from 5 to 9 means that the real level of this junior was probably around 7 on week 4 ?
Which means that the certified talent of 3-3.3 is highly questionable. And if that's so questionnable then the so-called certification is irrelevant.
(editado)

You talk about combination, series, statistics, but have you ever tried to confront your theories and algorithms ?

Sure, I take your words : Talent: 3~3.3 ✓

There's a small chance to loose my prediction, but i am confident.

So, It's a fresh new junior promoted. His owner will train pace.
Judging from talent, ending levels and higher probabilities (certified) he will up in pace in max 3 weeks and random up at least in 1 other skill (exluding stamina its too easy), certainly more. We can also check 6 weeks later if you need to confirm talent (with pace) or if training is missing (injuries or...)

So note your calendar, and let s see how theories meets reality. Ok ?

EDIT : i miss the player, so :
Jacques Sesia, âge: 16, taille: 170 cm
valeur: 26 250 €, salaire: 575 €
club: Nikosteam, pays: France
forme [9] très bon, discipline tactique [0] tragique

endurance [3] médiocre, gardien [0] tragique
vitesse [4] faible, défense [0] tragique
technique [5] moyen, construction [5] moyen
passe [4] faible, buteur [1] désespérant
(editado)

You are providing few weeks and a player that has so many jumps.
I wonder what is the "correct" answer to that talent
(editado)

There is a "corrected" series with less jumps (3/9), it is not so much.

"Correct" talents are always those that best match, its never mean they really are, even with more weeks and less jumps. There is no other "correct" answer, no tool can guaranteed a real talent.

If promoted juniors (sumkills, senior training) match with predicted junior talents and levels, so its correct.

I never said it was impossible for this junior to be talented but that it was presumptuous to grant a talent certification. This junior might end up being talented, it's all a question of gambling with this progression and number of weeks at YS. In fact, I really hope you're right. but I'm more interested in you responding the questions left unanswered.

How can we trust your tool when adding an extra level to this junior on week 0 gives us so much discrepancies in % accuracy and talent estimation (86% & 3-3.3 with certified talend vs 19% & 3-5+ ?
How can you give a talent certification to a junior who stayed 8 weeks, was probably at level 7 in week 4 and came out with a level 7 something in week 8?
(editado)

I ve already answered your so called unanswered question. If my answers don't stand with you, so that's it.

Updates. Introducing trainings report

https://www.sktables.org/news/update_mars_25


(editado)

Any idea why I can't logg in anymore? Password is correct, everything was jus fine, and now - nope.

I can't resolve password problems in forum

1) user who enter wrong sokker login or password can't connect anymore during one day. (not my fault, it's sokker API fault)
2) No password are registered in skTables for security, I can't check myself if your password was correct or not.
3) Next days, try again to login:
Don't use any auto-fill login/password provide by your browser, type again your login/pswd
Be 100% sure to enter a correct sokker password (you can click on "eye icon" to reveal your password)
4) if login fail again, please contact me by skmail, I will check with you.
(editado)

Server "blacklisted" today

Nobody will be able to connect sktables.org with login this day. Sorry for the inconvenience.
(editado)