Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Asunto: »Statistical deviations
- 1
- 2
releme para
Todos
For those who saw the discussion here:
https://sokker.org/forum_topic/ID_forum/1259/ID_topic/3650701/pg/1
And regarding the sentence: "And again on Portugal's side, out of 4 good center forwards, only 1 can play. 2 of them got injured just this Wednesday, and 1 lost form."
I have to say that this 1 center forward left that game againt Peru injured after 15 minutes.
Against all odds, Portugal had 11 shots on goal against 6... and drew 0-0. I had warned that this game was made so that Portugal wouldn't win... and Portugal didn't win. Will I be a fortune teller?
Prathet Thai - Danmark
> Danmark had 27 shots and scored 9 goals
Prathet Thai - Perú
> Perú had 34 shots and scored 10 goals
Portugal - Prathet Thai / Prathet Thai - Portugal
> Portugal had 31 shots and scored 3 goals
> Portugal had 33 shots and scored 5 goals
Portugal has 3 points less than Peru, and has 3 games that it has not won and could have won. Goal difference is important. And in the same group between the same teams, Portugal always has fewer goals. Portugal has already done enough to be in 2nd place, but several strange things are keeping that small gap behind 2nd place.
We are in season 72. Against Portugal, Peru averaged 79.2 in a game that ended 5-5 (!?! which is not normal). Since season 68!!! that Peru did not have such a high average score. Peru's best average score in season 68 was against... Portugal.
In Danmark - Deutschland the game was 1-1. Then a red card for the Danmark defender gave Deutschland the win.
Portugal's best defender was injured today. He's the only defender with enough quality to do something next week against... Deutschland.
In my opinion, Deutschland has several weaknesses in its strategy. Deutschland lost to Andorra. Andorra is so, so weak... that no one thought it was necessary to steal Andorra. Andorra was not robbed and that was enough to beat Deutschland. Sokker was an honest game in this game! Ahahah
I've been told that today I'm unlucky and that tomorrow I'll be lucky. I agree that luck and bad luck is something that one day falls on one side and the next day falls on the other side. This is the definition of luck and bad luck.
For me, if luck always falls on the richest countries, and bad luck always falls on Portugal's side, it's not luck or bad luck. It is not a random variable. It is a variable correlated with the desire to make money and make profitable people happier so they can make more money.
I will continue to wait for my "lucky day" and for these statistical deviations that have harmed Portugal in every game... to end.
And until that happens, I will continue to demand honesty and transparency.
At least one other online manager has already been honest enough to officially publish that only those who pay can advance to the cups.
These teams, plus a few hand-picked minorities to have representation, and who one year are the big surprises and the next disappear... are the ones who are "lucky".
Where is Crna Gora ... which this year is not run by an administrator?
Where is as-Saʻūdiyya, who represented Arabia... and who kept the same coach?
Were they actually good? Or were they just chosen that year?
I'm just asking questions. I'm not saying anything.
Good luck.
https://sokker.org/forum_topic/ID_forum/1259/ID_topic/3650701/pg/1
And regarding the sentence: "And again on Portugal's side, out of 4 good center forwards, only 1 can play. 2 of them got injured just this Wednesday, and 1 lost form."
I have to say that this 1 center forward left that game againt Peru injured after 15 minutes.
Against all odds, Portugal had 11 shots on goal against 6... and drew 0-0. I had warned that this game was made so that Portugal wouldn't win... and Portugal didn't win. Will I be a fortune teller?
Prathet Thai - Danmark
> Danmark had 27 shots and scored 9 goals
Prathet Thai - Perú
> Perú had 34 shots and scored 10 goals
Portugal - Prathet Thai / Prathet Thai - Portugal
> Portugal had 31 shots and scored 3 goals
> Portugal had 33 shots and scored 5 goals
Portugal has 3 points less than Peru, and has 3 games that it has not won and could have won. Goal difference is important. And in the same group between the same teams, Portugal always has fewer goals. Portugal has already done enough to be in 2nd place, but several strange things are keeping that small gap behind 2nd place.
We are in season 72. Against Portugal, Peru averaged 79.2 in a game that ended 5-5 (!?! which is not normal). Since season 68!!! that Peru did not have such a high average score. Peru's best average score in season 68 was against... Portugal.
In Danmark - Deutschland the game was 1-1. Then a red card for the Danmark defender gave Deutschland the win.
Portugal's best defender was injured today. He's the only defender with enough quality to do something next week against... Deutschland.
In my opinion, Deutschland has several weaknesses in its strategy. Deutschland lost to Andorra. Andorra is so, so weak... that no one thought it was necessary to steal Andorra. Andorra was not robbed and that was enough to beat Deutschland. Sokker was an honest game in this game! Ahahah
I've been told that today I'm unlucky and that tomorrow I'll be lucky. I agree that luck and bad luck is something that one day falls on one side and the next day falls on the other side. This is the definition of luck and bad luck.
For me, if luck always falls on the richest countries, and bad luck always falls on Portugal's side, it's not luck or bad luck. It is not a random variable. It is a variable correlated with the desire to make money and make profitable people happier so they can make more money.
I will continue to wait for my "lucky day" and for these statistical deviations that have harmed Portugal in every game... to end.
And until that happens, I will continue to demand honesty and transparency.
At least one other online manager has already been honest enough to officially publish that only those who pay can advance to the cups.
These teams, plus a few hand-picked minorities to have representation, and who one year are the big surprises and the next disappear... are the ones who are "lucky".
Where is Crna Gora ... which this year is not run by an administrator?
Where is as-Saʻūdiyya, who represented Arabia... and who kept the same coach?
Were they actually good? Or were they just chosen that year?
I'm just asking questions. I'm not saying anything.
Good luck.
Yes, it all makes sense now ! I was blind but I can see now !
Sokker bidding mafia had high stakes on Peru. It makes sense now
If you had Seara( your best striker) at the games with Peru the result could be different but you had a
smart idea to put him out of NT sqad(he had 11 form that time).Now you call him is too late even he has 3 goals at 90 min that you used him at two games.My advice is if you want to take resutl with Germany let him play 90 min and of course imprve your tactics
(editado)
smart idea to put him out of NT sqad(he had 11 form that time).Now you call him is too late even he has 3 goals at 90 min that you used him at two games.My advice is if you want to take resutl with Germany let him play 90 min and of course imprve your tactics
(editado)
Even with that form he can make the diference.Do you have many strikers amlost 3x18?( next week he will be 18 tech)
I will show you the skills via private message. In any case, Portugal in that game had 11 shots against 6. It was enough to keep the score from being 0-0. The opponent has better players, so my tactic was good.
- 1
- 2