Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Asunto: Sokker PLUS? No thanks until I see real changes
it's a bit cheaper if you subscribe and pay monthly
doesn't really make sense since a straight up front yearly payment is better for a game that's supposed to be invested in, but oh well
my plus is running out in October and I'm going non-plus again. I paid because I saw time/money investment in the game and some hope for game improvement, I don't see that anymore, I don't see any changes that make sense since a long time, so I don't see the point in paying for plus anymore
(editado)
doesn't really make sense since a straight up front yearly payment is better for a game that's supposed to be invested in, but oh well
my plus is running out in October and I'm going non-plus again. I paid because I saw time/money investment in the game and some hope for game improvement, I don't see that anymore, I don't see any changes that make sense since a long time, so I don't see the point in paying for plus anymore
(editado)
I rely on plus features as autoupdated training graphs and scouting old matches. Statistics pages are a small sidebonus. And I find the fee very reasonable if they actually improved the game, communicated and started spending on marketing to attract a little intake of new users.
But Im kinda like the rest of you, so if it hadnt been for training graphs and opponents scouting i would also quit my subscription.
But if the game had all the things i wish for (improvements in a faster tempo, better communication and some decent marketing) i wouldnt even mind paying 50-100% more
But Im kinda like the rest of you, so if it hadnt been for training graphs and opponents scouting i would also quit my subscription.
But if the game had all the things i wish for (improvements in a faster tempo, better communication and some decent marketing) i wouldnt even mind paying 50-100% more
In other words, the price for what we get is more then tripple what we actually get, but the game has so much unused potential even as an old browser game, that it could charge even more if they delivered all their promises
Cause if this game didnt have something special to offer, we wouldnt be so many old users left after the game even been so neglected
Cause if this game didnt have something special to offer, we wouldnt be so many old users left after the game even been so neglected
+1
I too wanted to believe that there was finally a leap in quality, but we continue to work on negligible things and not on the heart of the game.
+1
I too wanted to believe that there was finally a leap in quality, but we continue to work on negligible things and not on the heart of the game.
my plus is running out in October and I'm going non-plus again.
Same here. My yearly subscription ended few days ago. For me almost 50 is bit too much, because the only feature I use is training graphs.
Same here. My yearly subscription ended few days ago. For me almost 50 is bit too much, because the only feature I use is training graphs.
I don't even understand it. The game has tremendous potential... the hardest part is already done, which is the total tactical freedom it gives you to play however you want. But I don't understand these back-and-forths from the developers. Maybe in two weeks, the development diary will show that they've added the commission percentage to the initial price and the sales price as if it were a new feature of the game.
the hardest part is already done, which is the total tactical freedom it gives you to play however you want
only in theory
in reality the tactical aspect is extremely limited due to the fact that at high level only a couple of formations and player roles function properly / have a chance of good result
playing 4 at the back is impossible
playing a REAL 3 at the back is impossible
using a "10" is impossible
as for potential - it was here 20, 15 years ago, now there is no real potential for this kind of browser, classical game anymore. it's a game for older 30+ people who usually don't have time or will to play anymore because they have better or more important things to do in life.
only in theory
in reality the tactical aspect is extremely limited due to the fact that at high level only a couple of formations and player roles function properly / have a chance of good result
playing 4 at the back is impossible
playing a REAL 3 at the back is impossible
using a "10" is impossible
as for potential - it was here 20, 15 years ago, now there is no real potential for this kind of browser, classical game anymore. it's a game for older 30+ people who usually don't have time or will to play anymore because they have better or more important things to do in life.
it's better for older teams who can sit on solid bank balances despite having -40 million or more in transfer debts.
Sucks for newer teams though.
Sucks for newer teams though.
how about you create your own game and give favor, fortune and happiness to every user?
Can hardly wait to join if available..
Can hardly wait to join if available..
i am not joking. this is my main will when playing a football managerial game.
but if you feel funny with my mind, its okay.
but if you feel funny with my mind, its okay.