Asunto: Tactics advice

Pure 3-5-2 tactic can be good only if you have good mids that will control the game without passing balls outside when they try to pass to the wings (unless you play weak opponent and will win anyway...) , it will also make you vulnerable if he will play a winger , so it should be more like a 5-3-2 tactic if you ask me..

About 4-5-1 , almost the same about the mid , but its easier to set the defence if you play the 4 man high , im not a fan of a one striker tactic if you play a match when you are going to control with your mids (as it sounds like) , its better to give them one more option in the box to pass too + there can allways be a rebound from the keeper that the 2nd striker can run for..

p.s
Bottom line - Its all about your opponent...
(editado)

4-2-1-3
4 def 4 mid 6 att
1 mid injured
1 mid red card
=
4-2-1-3 :)


what's it like?
badbadbadbadbad?:)
(editado)

İf You Have Good Forwards And Good Wingers... I Always Use One Forward and One Winger... Why Should I Use 2 Forward or 2 Winger? Or When I Need Use 2 Forward or 2 Winger? I Wanna See Your Thinkings... Maybe I Will Learn New İmportant Things.. Ty


Why not?
I played like that in my last league match , can be nice if you have the right players and both wingers are good enough..

About 4-3-3 , i think its better to make it a 5-2-3 without wingers , if you realy realy want to play 3 strikers.
Semp against Hong Kong

433 with two wings...? There's no such good tactic...

Played this tactic for a season and only lost one game :)

Its the one you are using now?
Ill say its more a 4-5-1 or 4-1-2-2-1 if you want to call it this way..
:-O

And nice ratings..
Is Tubul for sale?...
;-)
(editado)

Well, you can name it whatever you want ;)

Tubul may leave if you pay the right price of course :)

well he's looking for a 3 striker tactic. and yours is 4321, akin to mine.
other people training striker I know play 2 real forwards and one playing forward behind them along with one winger, which might pay off if you have a striker with good secondaries, your opponents play a deep defense and/or have a weak gk.
(editado)

I know out NT team played some matches with 3 strikers. Maybe he can contact our BC and ask him for the tactic :)

really?
wow, agaist weaker opponents I assume:
what did he play? 433?

btw. 523 would be another option.

The feeling I've had after my different tries at 4-3-3 is that the offense havent really worked out. I could imagine a 4-3-3 tactic working ONLY if the center attacker was really defensive, almost like a offensive midfielder.

I imagine, I don't particularly like it either. bit it's a possibility. but if you have defenders with good secondaries and your striker positioning is sound it can be one hell of a counter-tactic.

Who knows a good tactics (3 defender, 1 def-mid, mid 3 and 2 att) and could paste it here?

I would be very grateful:)


P.S. I do, but I have a complete void in the head :(

Yours

433 with two wings...?

I tried something like that in my last competition match. I did win, but I guess that's not a real achievement considering he's 8th in our leaque and I'm 2nd. :P
It's not very consistent since it's very weak against wingers, but it was worth a try. But judge for yourself if you like it. :)

edit: it's actually more of a 3-2-0-2-3, but whatever :P
(editado)

About 4-3-3 , i think its better to make it a 5-2-3 without wingers , if you realy realy want to play 3 strikers.
Semp against Hong Kong

You do have to take into account that my tactic was crap in that match ;-)

hehe
I knew you will respond on that...
;-)

Was crap... but my tactic worked since it supprised you...
So thats leads us to the bottom line as i said before - its all about the opponent....
;-)

p.s
I played in semllier way against Senegal too and it worked fine , but they are weaker than you , so ill used the match against you as an example...
;-)