Asunto: Tactics advice

Naaaah, more something like this 3-4-3 or this 3-4-3 with wingbacks also, the whole tactic, not just the tactic board... :)

Well i´ve had okay success with playing 3-4-3 in the past, but actually more like 4-3-1-2 now.... the problem is just that i got 3 att and 2 wing atts i train on, so need to fit them into a tactic...

I've gone to a standard 5-3-2 will be changing to a 5-4-1 soon.

It's helped to keep a clean sheet in the last 2 league games.

Not sure how I feel training defenders though, 3-4-3 would be a cool formation. 3-5-2 is my favourite on FIFA lol, but I'd imagine on here playing against 2 top class strikers would break through too easily.

Got me interested though I'll have a play around with it.
(editado)

If you play 3-4-3 versus no wings, you can perform well sure.... but against winger u need to have 2 of the midfielders go down as wingbacks, in my 3-4-3 with wingbacks they attack in the side the ball is, but then stay back in opposite side of where you attack, maybe a little towards above nearest def, blocks many of angles for winger pass.... but its hard, and u cant get below 5 chances towards you versus even team, but is more fun.. :D

If you train defenders, get 2 def mids to train, your center defs will need a little bit of secondaries anyway to be any good... :)
(editado)

you can always play 532, with two very wide and a bit higher side defenders...and you can place def mids on that position

it's safer and easier

and it's quite handy as you can easily play 532 and traing 5 mids at league games...


--------------x---------x------------
----trained---trained---trained----
trained-----------------------trained
-----------x-------x-------x-----------

Yes i did so while i trained mids, but i am at strikers now....

striker training sucks

it's slower than other trainings, except pace

and you can only train 3 + 3 players in it

imo 433 is the only sensible way of playing...523 / 343 are worse...but that's my opinion

well 343 with wingbacks might be decent

What are people's thoughts on wide strikers compared to being more central?

I've got these two players that would work well at the WB position

formidable stamina tragic keeper
unearthly pace divine defender
incredible technique excellent playmaker
incredible passing very good striker

excellent stamina tragic keeper
divine pace divine defender
brilliant technique very good playmaker
magical passing outstanding striker

Would you say it had any benefit over a 4-3-3, but playing the two wingers in the MID role?

4-3-3, but playing the two wingers in the MID role?

You mean this??

-----striker--striker--striker----
wing-------------------------wing
---------------mid-----------------
--def----def-----def-----def-----


or this??

----------striker-----------
wing-----------------wing
------mid--mid--mid-----
--def--def--def--def----

???

The second one, I did have a play around with a 4-3-3 with very wide Mid's in the winger role.

4-3-3

I think this would be more effective over a 5-3-2 with WB's?

---

I am playing 442(wing) right now, but I really would want to play 352 because I'm training MIDs... This guy is a fullback at the moment in league matches because of that.

formidable [11] stamina unsatisfactory [2] keeper
brilliant [14] pace excellent [10] defender
unearthly [16] technique magical [15] playmaker
incredible [13] passing weak [4] striker

I have one MID trainee, who's worse, 19y, but with formidable DEF, should I play 532, too, with two wingbacks a bit higher? It would be 5212, that 1 would be my winger, because he's the best one in the team but without DEF skill, so he's no good in the middle, I guess(you can check our the skills in the team page). Thanks for the help. :)