Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Asunto: »Sokker Questions/Answers

2024-01-10 20:09:23


Translation: 75' winning by the most 1 goal Renzo Koopal on position 6

I was trailing by one goal at that moment. Why does this substitution happen?
2024-01-10 20:14:19
I believe that this order is messed up (as are others) and takes into account "every other result than winning by more than 1 goal"

so the situations that trigger it are:
a. losing
b. drawing
c. winning 1:0
2024-01-10 20:27:10
1-0? not winning with one goal lead?
2024-01-10 20:27:37
The key word is winning, winning is not losing or drawing. I've been playing this game whole my life and still don't know how to use conditions and I think that no one knows.
2024-01-10 20:37:32
if it works as you says, it should be rather "at most winning by one goal" instead of "winning by at most one goal"
2024-01-10 21:04:21
In Spanish it says "losing, drawing or winning by at most X goals" and that's how it always worked for me
(editado)
2024-01-10 21:25:21
If it is written in Spanish in that way, it should be in all languages. In Bosnian, as in English, it prejudices that the condition is satisfied if you are winning, by most/at least X goals, losing and drawing are not mentioned.

So, what should I do if I want to make the change only if I'm winning by 1 goal? Now I doubt if it is even possible.
2024-01-10 21:25:34
And that's how it should be written correctly

In Polish it's also bad, because it suggests that the order will be triggered only when winning

@kryminator
in Polish it is "wygrywam co najwyżej 1 bramką" so yeah, I think it will count losing, drawing and winning by 1 / every other win (by 2 goals, 3 goals etc.) won't enable the order
2024-01-10 21:26:54
Yes, the only possible option would be "winning by at least 1 goal" but that of course will trigger the order also when winning by 2, 3, 4 goals etc.
2024-01-11 19:48:31
There is still the solution of drawing or losing, but that doesn't include a 1-0 advantage.
So adding that to the ''winning by at most 1 goal'' is the closest best thing to do I guess...
2024-01-12 09:31:21
traxex para Dtox9
this friday has no maintenance and no update, why?

my player should be slight injury by now, and can be played
2024-01-12 10:13:23
It could be that yesterday your player had 7,95 days of injury and today he has 7,02 e.g. And slight injury is below 7 days.
If you're talking about him - Benny Musa'ad [39120422].
2024-01-12 10:21:06
mangol para traxex
Today`s events:
Friday
2024-01-12 05:01:25 Player values updated
2024-01-12 05:01:15 Stadium building works progressed
2024-01-12 05:01:14 Injured players underwent medical check-ups
2024-01-12 10:29:14
not him but this guy

thx for answering
2024-01-12 10:41:46
mangol para traxex
for players at their 30 You need to multiply injuried days, since their recovery from injuries is really slow
2024-01-12 10:46:05
trga para mangol
I can understand this logic...i also need in my middle 30's more time, to recover from a drinking day/night, as it was in my 20's...