Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
¡¡¡Tema cerrado!!!
Asunto: Worldwar
it's bible or darwin.. other gods from hinduism or other religions don't have any substance..so if you want or don't it's Jesus or darwin...life is 100% God 's will is not natural selection...in 1997 i had a dispute with a lady from a radio station, she said , ernesto hoost is god. i cursed ernesto hoost then and i paid a little bit later..i understand why ernesto hoost was god but now i say he is not longer god even for deranged mind..men can be gods for a while but finally they lose..i believe that Jesus can't lose, God is 100% real in my opinion but i don't know what he want, bible have some clues
I agree,
we should also restart to burn on wood those that use magic or that are erethical.
god need to be protected by us, surely..
I agree,
we should also restart to burn on wood those that use magic or that are erethical.
god need to be protected by us, surely..
i can accept life as it is, but i added Jesus, it's no other way if you are rationally
if you are rationally
Rationality and God are 2 opposite things!
(editado)
Rationality and God are 2 opposite things!
(editado)
who made you ? rationally..God is the true answer
(editado)
(editado)
parents is good answer, try to study a little or visit your doctor for more pils...
(editado)
(editado)
Have you ever read anything about Stephen Hawking?
Or did you read only Bible? Or something who supports it?
And, if you wanna say that God is a rational answer, then or you don't know what rationality is, or you are a bit hypocrite (with no offence, of course).
Or did you read only Bible? Or something who supports it?
And, if you wanna say that God is a rational answer, then or you don't know what rationality is, or you are a bit hypocrite (with no offence, of course).
ok, enough
topic is worldwar and this discussion leads to nowhere...
topic is worldwar and this discussion leads to nowhere...
But some people on earth use this kind of subject to make a worldwar ;-)
(editado)
(editado)
...lessons from history: same old excuses.
"Now Poland is a fascist state, oppressing the Ukrainians, Belorussians and so forth. The annihilation of that state under current conditions would mean one fewer bourgeois fascist state to contend with!"
- 7 September 1939, Joseph Stalin
The red army crossed into Poland on 17 September 1939.
(map on the right) = May 1941, after the Nazi(Hitler)-Soviet(Stalin) Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact,
15 may 1941 = Nazi Germany attack Soviet Russia.
= Putin's idiotic mentality.
(editado)
"Now Poland is a fascist state, oppressing the Ukrainians, Belorussians and so forth. The annihilation of that state under current conditions would mean one fewer bourgeois fascist state to contend with!"
- 7 September 1939, Joseph Stalin
The red army crossed into Poland on 17 September 1939.
(map on the right) = May 1941, after the Nazi(Hitler)-Soviet(Stalin) Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact,
15 may 1941 = Nazi Germany attack Soviet Russia.
= Putin's idiotic mentality.
(editado)
I'm an european and I don't see any kind of democratic system un UE.
I think there are some similarities to Nazist exspansion (first of all the lack of democracy UE spread around the continent, the german leadership, the moralist value system, the financing of nazi's and terrorists) and some very big differences (the lack of physical violence and war, the freedom of ideas etc, the progress of ideas and the protection of citizen).
I think both sides use this kind of arguments and ideology in order to get some hooligans and not some informed and critical citizens.
I think Russia is a regime, ruled by an oppressing dictator.
I think EU is a regime ruled by an oligarchy, that neutralizes democracy leaving only the empty shell of it.
I surely prefer to live in UE than Russia, but I try to not become a fan of it. When "my" EU spend money financing nazi's to overcome a foregin government I do not wave any blue flag with the little stars.
I think there are some similarities to Nazist exspansion (first of all the lack of democracy UE spread around the continent, the german leadership, the moralist value system, the financing of nazi's and terrorists) and some very big differences (the lack of physical violence and war, the freedom of ideas etc, the progress of ideas and the protection of citizen).
I think both sides use this kind of arguments and ideology in order to get some hooligans and not some informed and critical citizens.
I think Russia is a regime, ruled by an oppressing dictator.
I think EU is a regime ruled by an oligarchy, that neutralizes democracy leaving only the empty shell of it.
I surely prefer to live in UE than Russia, but I try to not become a fan of it. When "my" EU spend money financing nazi's to overcome a foregin government I do not wave any blue flag with the little stars.
When "my" EU spend money financing nazi's to overcome a foregin government I do not wave any blue flag with the little stars.
It almost never is just 1 group who stand up against a corrupt government.
And that's how it works when you are 'all together'. I'm also not happy my money is spend on a country which voted an anti-EU communist, but unfortunately that's how things go.
It almost never is just 1 group who stand up against a corrupt government.
And that's how it works when you are 'all together'. I'm also not happy my money is spend on a country which voted an anti-EU communist, but unfortunately that's how things go.
I can agree with you to some extent on the points you made on EU, ...yet, you completely missed my point, nor the implications it might have towards a potential world conflict.
The point was: that a "oppressing dictator"(in your words), can and does use the same excuse that his predecessor(Stalin) used in 1941, just before a clear treacherous attack in stabbing Poland in the back, on 17 september 1939 hence - aggression in the WW2 by soviet russia, all in the name of "anti-facism" they murdered millions of people (katyn) and kept Poland under control for half a century, until the fall of the soviet union 1989-92.
Poland was never a fascist state, definitely not in 1939 (hence that many jews) when Hitler and Stalin attacked - together, just like Ukraine is not a fascist state now. Precisely my point, it is the nonsense RT (moscow state controlled) propaganda spreads, which unfortunately many people seem to buy... or give "equal weight" to - which is absurd or irrational, to the point: Most Ukrainians are neither loyal Russians nor fascists
..just have a look at the results of the parliamentary elections 2012 before the conflict.
And even worse, the Russian propaganda even now... plays down the role of Stalin: 1939-1941, making him a national hero :-o, the "conqueror of fascism" which is a disgraceful hypocrisy, that most Russians are forced, a unfortunately do believe more and more... In Russia now "fascism" is only a justification for war, and a way to sway public opinion towards it, towards more spending for military in Russia.
Its a bit like posting Hitler on buses in Berlin, to commemorate the "victory against communism!" :-]
(editado)
The point was: that a "oppressing dictator"(in your words), can and does use the same excuse that his predecessor(Stalin) used in 1941, just before a clear treacherous attack in stabbing Poland in the back, on 17 september 1939 hence - aggression in the WW2 by soviet russia, all in the name of "anti-facism" they murdered millions of people (katyn) and kept Poland under control for half a century, until the fall of the soviet union 1989-92.
Poland was never a fascist state, definitely not in 1939 (hence that many jews) when Hitler and Stalin attacked - together, just like Ukraine is not a fascist state now. Precisely my point, it is the nonsense RT (moscow state controlled) propaganda spreads, which unfortunately many people seem to buy... or give "equal weight" to - which is absurd or irrational, to the point: Most Ukrainians are neither loyal Russians nor fascists
..just have a look at the results of the parliamentary elections 2012 before the conflict.
And even worse, the Russian propaganda even now... plays down the role of Stalin: 1939-1941, making him a national hero :-o, the "conqueror of fascism" which is a disgraceful hypocrisy, that most Russians are forced, a unfortunately do believe more and more... In Russia now "fascism" is only a justification for war, and a way to sway public opinion towards it, towards more spending for military in Russia.
Its a bit like posting Hitler on buses in Berlin, to commemorate the "victory against communism!" :-]
(editado)