Asunto: Ultimate Manager

Look at my coachs

SNODGRASS Gilbert Age 49 et 357 Jours

ENTRAINEUR
Evaluation
9,99

Salaire 49 925

Gardien 15 .................... Tackle 20 .................... Tir 15 ....................
Tête 15 .................... Vitesse 15 .................... Passe 15 ....................
Technique 20 .................... Vision 20 ....................


JAMES Ferdy Age 53 et 269 Jours

ENTRAINEUR
Evaluation
9,91

Salaire 49 269

Gardien 14 .................... Tackle 15 .................... Tir 20 ....................
Tête 15 .................... Vitesse 20 .................... Passe 15 ....................
Technique 20 .................... Vision 15 ....................

:O

Technique 20 twice is a waste :P

yep. but my reaction was like that because even i don't ahve 2 coaches near to 9.99

these 2 coachs come today for my team. but my main team's coach pace , playmaking and passing are 19 . shall I promote this guy who same skills are 20 ?

I don't think the difference too big, and hardly worth the 45'000 a week you'd have to pay for the second coach for another 33 weeks...;-)

ok :))


FATURACHI Namig


Dismissal Price 1,114,311


That is why I will not sack him :)))

reasonable...;-))

Well, you can now see that some of your seats in the stadium are "degraded", I hope they become very expensive to repair to balance it with the very cheap cost of expanding the stadium.

I just expanded my stadium to the max capacity I'll ever need, so I hope the repairs won't be too expensive :p

lol, to be fair, something needs to counter the excessive cheapness of expanding the stadium. To balance things out. :P

I dont wanna be polemic, but this viewer: Match Viewer is actually good.

This is a match between 2 of the best teams in UM.
(editado)

Looks like the standard viewer to me... Are there any changes?

It is the standard viewer, my point is that it is a good viewer.

It's got it's good points but I wouldn't describe the viewer as one of the strong points of UM.

I would give it 8 out of 10. The fact that the players can actually make good short passes and even long passes (from left mid-winger to the right mid-winger for example) makes it good. Also the detail that you can actually see the stadium of the home team and the crowd is a nice touch. You can also rewind and change your tactic in mid game.

In sokker you need a super team and like 2 years of playing to actually see your players make an accurated pass. Good, Solid, Very good, excellent at passing in sokker is still not good to hand a good pass, and thats not realistic. Dont get me wrong, I like sokker, but some things about it are not realistic. Still I also give sokker viewer 8 out of 10.

Both games viewers have their flaws and their pros, but the thing is that UM is 1 year old and sokker is 7 years old. I am seeing faster progress and improvement in UM. I hope this makes the sokker developers to start improving sokker viewer too.
(editado)