Asunto: »Political & economic ideologies (communism, capitalism et

Rejecting liberalism because there is a certain amount (a big minority considering what other ideologies achieve) of poverty under liberalism is like rejecting sex because there is pornography.

Edit: and the UK isn't even a liberal country. It's relatively liberal (from socialist Europe's POV).
(editado)

that is just the beginning.
the worst part is coming.
I wonder when people will start learning from historys lessons, liberalism has always brought poverty to people. Is stupid to exspect something else. Is stupid to listen to the propaganda of the fews that this system feeds.

You compare liberalism = sex and poverty = pornography ? ... I know why you always laughable when i read you

liberalism has always brought poverty to people

Good one. Now go and read some history, will you?

(At least, read something about Weber's 'The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism'.)
(editado)

You compare liberalism = sex and poverty = pornography ?

No. I say both rejections are stupid. I compare the rejections.

You can laugh when you actually understand and heavily disagree. Obviously, the first condition is not met.

Good one. Now go and read some history, will you?

LOL.
Stop your (criminal) propaganda.

Weber is criminal propaganda. Duly noted.

Edit: Nice that you actually admit that one characteristic of leftists is the fact that they want liberalism to be a crime. Oppression and violence, all hail socialism ;-)
(editado)

not YOUR is criminal propaganda, that forget any kind of normal evaluation criterion to value a system, basically because of an ideological attitude.

But, please, stop trolling me, I was writing it to another person.

Nice that you actually admit that one characteristic of leftists
I'm not leftist.
Your head is still in the WRONG CENTURY!!!

not YOUR is criminal propaganda, that forget any kind of normal evaluation criterion to value a system, basically because of an ideological attitude.

And now in proper English?

I'm not leftist.

To me, you are. You're a collectivist. You're anti-capitalist, anti-liberal and anti-indivualist. That's pretty leftist to me.

Then i can laugh :-))

Edit : Your innocence to understand other people make me feel nice when i see your answers ;-)
(editado)

You're a collectivist.

wrong

You're anti-capitalist

wrong

anti-liberal and anti-indivualist

ROTFL

Stop trolling and stop your useless propaganda

secret police...





secret police causing a police charge, shame of country :(

I'm not defending the police here (I'm always very critical about the use of violence by the police!), but you cannot expect you can surround the parliament. It's pretty logic that it is illegal to completely surround the parliament. The parliament is the center of democracy and must be protected at all time, and therefore, there must always be a way out of the parliament.

You can protest against the parliament whenever you want, but simply don't completely surround it.

Excepted if people who surround this semblance of democraty think is totally useless or even more dangreous for the society... The revolution against atrocities of liberalism are in operation

It is the beginning of a new world...
(editado)