Asunto: »Political & economic ideologies (communism, capitalism et

yeah, but why does he troll her? it's not her fault that he has to pay it:) does who make the decision won't give a damn about it...

it's nothing original btw., I remember that one company [samsung?] paid a huge amount of money in 1 dollar bills [or were those coins? don't remember the details] to apple after a court ruling that they have breached the patent of apple:)

yeah, but why does he troll her? it's not her fault that he has to pay it:) does who make the decision won't give a damn about it...

Well, she chose to work for thieves.

---

remember that money and property is a creation of the state.
So this claim for "my money and my property" is completely senseless.
It's a funny video of a person that make an error in believing he has some natural right on property..
But he's still a stupid!

So policemen, firemen and doctors are also working for thieves, yes?

But he's still a stupid!

Yes, because people who have a different view on natural rights are stupid.

Yes. Their work is more respectable, but they are still working for thieves. (I guess you mean doctors in public hospitals.)

I think you're pointing out the wrong ones. The real thieves are the investment bankers (ergo most banks, as they most of the time have an investment part), they don't create any wealth, they create famine, poverty. Their enrichment happens on the back of honest working people.

Don't mistake them with the state, because they also manipulate the state, by sponsoring the politics. You can't lose, if you pay all the candidates... :(

Yes, because people who have a different view on natural rights are stupid.

yes. they decide to believe something is not logic, never seen and useless.
i think that are some propaganda reasons under it, but still no smart people believe in it.

i think that are some propaganda reasons under it, but still no smart people believe in it.

So there is not one libertarian that is smart?

The real thieves are the investment bankers (ergo most banks, as they most of the time have an investment part)

Do you know the definition of theft? The banks are not taking anything away with force from somebody who was the clear owner and who does not give permission to take his property away. The government does.

There are no smart libertarian that believes it.

Hayek, stupid. Mises, stupid. Friedman, stupid. Hoppe, stupid. Nozick, stupid. Bastiat, stupid.

You can disagree with the libertarian view on ownership, but that doesn't make libertarians stupid. I'm not going into the discussion again (we already did multiple times, no point in repeating that), but calling them stupid only indicates your arrogance and not their stupidity.

bro.. you didn't understand.

no smart libertarian believes the state taxation is theft.
That's a slogan useful to simplify and advertise in few words a concept.
No one of the people you mentioned would have sayd your "hero" is a clever mind..
He made a stupid claim without any effect.

Do you know the definition of theft? The banks are not taking anything away with force from somebody who was the clear owner and who does not give permission to take his property away. The government does.

you are no clear owner of anything until state gives you that right.
State gives you that right with a condition: taxes.
So state/gov didn't steal anything. That's useless propaganda.

No one of the people you mentioned would have sayd your "hero" is a clever mind..

He's not a hero. I just said it was epic. The heroes are those who avoid and evade taxes.
(editado)