Asunto: Brasil 2014

Add Giroud to the list now.

1 crime + 1 crime = 2 crimes

for "some" Uruguayans
1 crime + 1 crime = 0 crimes

Balanta? Nothing?

I see...


http://www.riverplate.com/Noticias/Selecciones/Mundial-Brasil-2014/22536-Balanta-Carbonero-Colombia-goleo-lidero-grupo.html

lol

and you're comparing it with what Suarez did? :D

Balanta was trying to block the Japanese with his hand and accidentally hit him with his elbow

Suarez intentionally bite Chiellini

totally different situation, how can you not see it?

Problem here is that Luis Suarez did it and if we beat Colombia he may face Brazil... and Brazil has to win this one to forget their pain.

Ofcourse, that's what the FIFA does. And ofcourse it has nothing to do with something as sick as biting another person .... FOR THE 3rd TIME!! :/

Being blinded by nationalism is not a good excuse to defend this sick and crazy behaviour. And to start searching for other wrong behaviour is also a bit strange, what Suarez did is biting (AGAIN), no need to search for other incidents which has absolutely nothing to do with a biting Suarez.

(editado)

how can you not see it?

we all know the answer :)
(editado)

Keep feeding the troll

pun unintended

@Richangelo: Thank you for better angle replay. I was realy sure that it was dive but its now clear that it was penalty. I still hate your football team though.
(editado)

+1
I hadn't seen Colombia's match. Now he showed us the action, I can't believe he's equating it with Suárez's.

You can only compare it to actions like Giroud today. But I'm guessing nothing's gonna happen with him, as Ecuador's player didn't dive...

Hey FIFA. Are you there?


(editado)

Maybe the french tried to get to the ball... wait... there's no ball! I'm sure this will be investigated shortly... zzzzz...
(editado)

Besides the previous suspensions can't be used against him becuase you will be punishing him for something that he was already punished. That is jurisprudence.

Exactly, in that theme is based the uruguayan defense, because it's understood that the match referee already sanctione the foul on the match...

That is football my friends...
Probably has been a previous discussion as there are in many games, and in the all levels. A bite is something mild because never injured other player, if the referee saw it, was red and nothing more...Worse, is much more severe he would have hit a bestial kick with intent to injure severely for example...but it can make a bite??

You have really nice manners in Uruguay, biting is not even in ladies games...its even same as brutal tackling, you cant prepare for it (if youre not at vampire event) and its so childish, you cant start to scratch players or pulling their hair...
(editado)

referee saw it and made a decision.
referee did not see what Suarez did. that's the difference.

No...the referee saw the play and the referee beep the foul. But , not saw the direct agression... neither of suarez, and neither of chiellini... because chiellini also attacked and generated the problem...

:D Maan, keep continuing and I have fun for all day!