Asunto: News Around The World

Actually, most people you meet in the street every day will also react like this to an insult to their mothers - but you can try, say, 100 random insults and keep track of the outcomes :P
The bottom line is, you may think it's wrong, but it doesn't take to be a fundamentalist-far right-communazi-eco-pope to behave like this...

news from the war zone:
Аэропорт. 16 января = Airport. January 16, Doneck
https://z5h64q92x9.net/tr-url/ru-en.en/colonelcassad.livejournal.com/1990146.html

(who want to see videos, need use original link (first link is translated for you),
http://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/1990146.html)

(for noobs, it is russian journal, so official news, I hope your "official" doesnt mean just western news :-) )

The West news not inform us about details of war, cos EU need support for this war so detail information had to be secret.
(editado)

It such a website, people and owner called it google. It is really funny tool, you just put there some words and it can find suitable newspaper. Unbelievable but try it !

I think you visit conspiracy websites way too often and find your links and conspiracy photos + stories on those websites. And that's most probably also the reason you can't post your sources because of the new topic rules of links and photos.

But anyway, you claim 'the truth' is so important, then please stop posting such obvious lies and conspiracies, and think about the sources you are using to make a point! Using Iranian websites to post about Israel and the US, and vice versa, is not well thought over if you really care about the truth and not only 'your truth'. The same for Russia and Ukraine, etc etc.

Interesting link to keep in mind, The 2014 World Press Freedom Index: http://rsf.org/index2014/en-index2014.php


EDIT: https://z5h64q92x9.net/tr-url/ru-en.en/colonelcassad.livejournal.com/1990146.html and Colonel Cassad , what kind of crap is this? Doesn't look official at all, more some home made blog with a selection of videos and photos. And ofcourse about your favorite subject, WAR!



EDIT2: And what about news which are made just by one man who called himself journalist. I think this censoring rules should be more specific.

Someone can call himself journalist but that doesn't mean he is, just as your nonsense claim you are a journalist. The rules are very clear about it. You don't like them, but that's because these rules prevent you from spamming and trolling. That's something you should have thought about when you posted all that nonsense. If you did have acted normal in the previous NATW topic, these rules would never been introduced and that topic would still be open. So blame yourself for this 'censoring'.
(editado)

Your faith that west=true east=lie are really very funny :-).

And
I think you visit conspiracy websites way too often
actually not, I have tens and tens RSS (all world) and a lot of news I am getting via skype from friends. So that idea that I am going to "conspiracy websities", if your mean directly, is not true.

I just dont need post here common west news, for this job you are here, so I am posting other side so some poeple here can open eyes :-).

If you want to open people's eyes, you should act a lot different. With all the obvious crap, lies and propaganda you have posted and still posting, no one will ever take your info serious.

and a lot of news I am getting via skype from friends.

Read it and look for other news about that same subject also. Think for yourself!
(editado)

whe are you reacting to rumpils posts? its always his world, his true and twisted point of view ;) no need to discuss it...

True :)

Time for me to do someting else now, enjoying the start of my weekend for example :D

it's amazing the fact that an islamic fundamentalist, a christian pope and a nazi-farright person can agree over the fact that someone should not says everything he prefer..

If you can, please quote this secertly "nazi", because I don't see any verbs.

And waht's the amazing, that they agree in a matter one of a milion? Probably you (and rest of the world) agree in a few matters with Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Guevara and other murderers.

Actually, most people you meet in the street every day will also react like this to an insult to their mothers - but you can try, say, 100 random insults and keep track of the outcomes :P
The bottom line is, you may think it's wrong, but it doesn't take to be a fundamentalist-far right-communazi-eco-pope to behave like this...

the point is not what one would do.
the point is what he says.
He says something that conflict with his own religion.
I think it's scandalous.

If you can, please quote this secertly "nazi", because I don't see any verbs.

I was referring to a general nazi (that's their normal ideas)


And waht's the amazing, that they agree in a matter one of a milion? Probably you (and rest of the world) agree in a few matters with Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Guevara and other murderers.

that's a good point.
But this is not only one point in a million. that is a very important founding principle.
the fact that a religion leader speak against freedom of speech is very dangerous.
The fact he justifies (although he blames too) violence as a respone for a word is to me the same justification that Kouachi brothers gave:
"you can't play with my sacred thing!"

Well in 2015 civilization has led us to understand that it is essential that I can play and make fun of the sacred thing of whoever I want.

He says something that conflict with his own religion.

Actually, he shows us that he's a man, a person, and not a godsent flawless jesus clone like most of the catholics believe a pope is. So he says "please dont insult my religion, my believes, my family and all the things that are so sacred for me, because i might react as any other human being". But if you filter it through the dogma, sure, he's a freaking terrorist...

the fact is he chooses to say it.
I can't think pope speak to journalists as me and you in front of a beer..

Well in 2015 civilization has led us to understand that it is essential that I can play and make fun of the sacred thing of whoever I want.

So, we have nolimiited freedom of word, or not?
I ask, because you write this sentence. And we have Charlie Hebdo (an thousands other institutions) who insult religion. And, for you, it's OK.
But, from second, when I post infos about islam threat, I'm accused about "islamophobia", "hate speech", and other funny things.
This is hypocrisy.
Or we should limited so called "freedom of speech", or we can talking everything. If "Charlie Hebdo" can post anty-religioius caricatures, who insult religiuos believers, I can write that muslims is a threat, homosexualizm isn't normal, etc.

Du bist unser Charlie:)

LOL :-D
http://www.euractiv.com/sections/social-europe-jobs/poland-wants-eu-complain-wto-over-russian-embargo-307859

How can be Poland so ..... ?(just "..." cos sokker censure and bans) So Europe sanctions against russia are ok, but russian against EU are bad, really funny.
(and we all know who start it)
(editado)