Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
¡¡¡Tema cerrado!!!
Asunto: News Around The World
You seem to have a really hard time to understand that the problems Greece currently faces are all due to austerity forced by the troika. Greece was in a very bad shape, financially, in 2008. The solution to Greece's problem was bad and Syriza wants to renegotiate. Voters in Western Europe believe that tons of their tax money went to Greece while money is actually coming from Greece. At the same time politicians try very hard to make the people believe that they're the only ones that make sure that not one single cent more is going to Greece while Greece produces great surpluses.
The only way to solve the problem would be to start spending money we don't have, just like the Greeks did, giving a huge boost to the economy.
The only way to solve the problem would be to start spending money we don't have, just like the Greeks did, giving a huge boost to the economy.
The only way to solve the problem would be to start spending money we don't have, just like the Greeks did, giving a huge boost to the economy.
If you spend money you boost demand, and demand push on prices.
but this mean inflaction and inflaction is bad..
...bad? ... bad for who?
for those that has "stocks" of money, not for those that has "flow"..
if you understand it.. you'll realize wich interests are now ruling EU government (read Merkel).
If you spend money you boost demand, and demand push on prices.
but this mean inflaction and inflaction is bad..
...bad? ... bad for who?
for those that has "stocks" of money, not for those that has "flow"..
if you understand it.. you'll realize wich interests are now ruling EU government (read Merkel).
If you spend money you boost demand, and demand push on prices.
Only at full capacity, which hardly describes the current situation in the Eurozone in general, and especially in countries with >20% unemployment.
Only at full capacity, which hardly describes the current situation in the Eurozone in general, and especially in countries with >20% unemployment.
Yep, but I think he was thinking about spending in the "center" countries.
Spending in the peripherical countries is useless.
Spending in the peripherical countries is useless.
It would also work in Greece. Greece's economy has shrunk massively and its unemployment has increased immensely. The logic of it is that the opposite, spending money, would have the opposite effect.
But inflation would have many good effects. It makes the whole of Europe more competitive, it reduces unemployment, it makes the debt burden smaller, but, most importantly (and especially this is why it's tough to sell), it decreases the gap between the poor and rich.
But inflation would have many good effects. It makes the whole of Europe more competitive, it reduces unemployment, it makes the debt burden smaller, but, most importantly (and especially this is why it's tough to sell), it decreases the gap between the poor and rich.
Liberation of Debaltsevo from fascists. Picture by Ivan Ryzhkov, 1947.
Russia opposition politician Boris Nemtsov shot dead
Before midnight (at 23:40 GMT+3) on 27 February 2015 in Moscow, Nemtsov was shot four times in the back as he was walking less than 200 metres from the Moscow Kremlin walls and Red Square with Anna Durytska, a Ukrainian model. He was crossing the Bolshoy Moskvoretsky Bridge when "several people" got out of a white car and shot him in the back.
Before midnight (at 23:40 GMT+3) on 27 February 2015 in Moscow, Nemtsov was shot four times in the back as he was walking less than 200 metres from the Moscow Kremlin walls and Red Square with Anna Durytska, a Ukrainian model. He was crossing the Bolshoy Moskvoretsky Bridge when "several people" got out of a white car and shot him in the back.
Who can derive the greatest benefit from this? Ukrainians.
Although there may be some inside games in the Russian special services.
Although there may be some inside games in the Russian special services.
Sure! That's just a coincidence that all the Russian leading oppositionists die a violent death sooner or later. Not long ago it was Berezovsky now it's Nemtsov. Earlier: Litvinenko, Politkovskaya, Klebnikov, Schekochikon, Golovlyov, Yushenkov...
Sure that foreigner agents killed all the oppositionists just to make poor Putin look suspicious.
Sure that foreigner agents killed all the oppositionists just to make poor Putin look suspicious.
I don't know why you mix all these things together.
The biggest suspect is always the one, who gained the most.
After the death of that Nemtsov, Putin didn't gain anything, could only lose. And Putin lose, gaining Ukraine, the EU and the US.
The biggest suspect is always the one, who gained the most.
After the death of that Nemtsov, Putin didn't gain anything, could only lose. And Putin lose, gaining Ukraine, the EU and the US.
Nemtsov was just gathering proof about Russian troops in Ukraine. So yes, Putin did win a lot with this murder, and the Ukrainians lost with it.
On the other hand, what did Putin lose? Nothing - the Kremlin media is full of with the same propaganda you just wrote (outsiders killed Nemtsov as a provocation), so Putin's popularity won't suffer at all. There was a demonstration in Moscow with a few thousand participants, but that was already being organized before the murder, and it's really nothing Putin would have to fear about.
I don't know why you mix all these things together.
Because they usually do that. Do you remember Western countries killing criticians of their government? I don't. But Russians do it almost every year, when someone becomes uncomfortable for the Kremlin. And they didn't lose anything with it yet, it actually helps them a lot to govern Russia by fear. What do you think, why isn't there any serious opposition in Russia?
(editado)
On the other hand, what did Putin lose? Nothing - the Kremlin media is full of with the same propaganda you just wrote (outsiders killed Nemtsov as a provocation), so Putin's popularity won't suffer at all. There was a demonstration in Moscow with a few thousand participants, but that was already being organized before the murder, and it's really nothing Putin would have to fear about.
I don't know why you mix all these things together.
Because they usually do that. Do you remember Western countries killing criticians of their government? I don't. But Russians do it almost every year, when someone becomes uncomfortable for the Kremlin. And they didn't lose anything with it yet, it actually helps them a lot to govern Russia by fear. What do you think, why isn't there any serious opposition in Russia?
(editado)