Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
¡¡¡Tema cerrado!!!
Asunto: News Around The World
but... to say the least - it seems that Putin's oppositionists have no luck whatsoever...
Yeh :/
Yeh :/
I think it is also worth mentioning, that the main international opposition to Putin's Russia comes from Poland... more right-wing poles to be precise...
You mean the main opposition to Russia, Putin's or not.
...in a survey made in 2012 results state that 17% of Poles are convinced that the Smoleńsk 2010 crash was not a accident, where as another 19% say in was probably not an accident :-], so about 11,ooo,ooo mln (1/3 of Poland :-o) mostly right-wing poles think that Putin's regime was behind the crash of the Polish presidential plane...
And Hugo Chávez thought CIA made him ill. My point precisely...
You mean the main opposition to Russia, Putin's or not.
...in a survey made in 2012 results state that 17% of Poles are convinced that the Smoleńsk 2010 crash was not a accident, where as another 19% say in was probably not an accident :-], so about 11,ooo,ooo mln (1/3 of Poland :-o) mostly right-wing poles think that Putin's regime was behind the crash of the Polish presidential plane...
And Hugo Chávez thought CIA made him ill. My point precisely...
And Hugo Chávez thought CIA made him ill. My point precisely...
With a big difference: Chávez lunacy vs. suspicion based on an endless list of political murders in favor of Putin.
So I don't really get your point, exactly.
(editado)
With a big difference: Chávez lunacy vs. suspicion based on an endless list of political murders in favor of Putin.
So I don't really get your point, exactly.
(editado)
"You mean the main opposition to Russia, Putin's or not." - no.
I mean what I wrote ;-p "main international opposition to Putin's Russia"
Most poles are against what we had in the "PRL"era (1952–1989) not to confuse with DRL ;-), which is oppression by Moscow's elites, in essence Kremlin's centralisation, communist, soviet, totalitarian - whatever you want to call it. This is the direction that Putin has taken, or re-taken since roughly 2004... (possibly earlier) but it became clearly apparent then... and yes, historically every pole is against a aggressive Russian foreign policy, which is probably what you mean... especially towards ex-soviet block countries... and again this is a direction Putin has taken since 2008... in Georgia, and historically the implications of that can be easily understood why. 2014 Ukraine... 2018.. 2020..?
..and things like that don't help the relation: Russia 'simulates' nuclear attack on Poland, 2009
Russia tests 100,000 troops in ‘Vostok 2014’, biggest-ever post-Soviet drills
Russia-China Naval Interaction-2014...
Russia carried out snap military drills in Kaliningrad region 2014
Russia to hold more large-scale military maneuvers in 2015 (again Kaliningrad region)
PS: firsty: why? what for? and secondly these are strictly offensive maneuvers, the scenario's involve landing operations and nuclear attacks on cities... :-] These are again only facts, our current reality. I wonder if the UK or US (or NATO maybe ;-p) are currently preparing for, practicing a sea and air invasion or a nuclear attack on Buenos Aires, LOL ;-) :-]
(editado)
I mean what I wrote ;-p "main international opposition to Putin's Russia"
Most poles are against what we had in the "PRL"era (1952–1989) not to confuse with DRL ;-), which is oppression by Moscow's elites, in essence Kremlin's centralisation, communist, soviet, totalitarian - whatever you want to call it. This is the direction that Putin has taken, or re-taken since roughly 2004... (possibly earlier) but it became clearly apparent then... and yes, historically every pole is against a aggressive Russian foreign policy, which is probably what you mean... especially towards ex-soviet block countries... and again this is a direction Putin has taken since 2008... in Georgia, and historically the implications of that can be easily understood why. 2014 Ukraine... 2018.. 2020..?
..and things like that don't help the relation: Russia 'simulates' nuclear attack on Poland, 2009
Russia tests 100,000 troops in ‘Vostok 2014’, biggest-ever post-Soviet drills
Russia-China Naval Interaction-2014...
Russia carried out snap military drills in Kaliningrad region 2014
Russia to hold more large-scale military maneuvers in 2015 (again Kaliningrad region)
PS: firsty: why? what for? and secondly these are strictly offensive maneuvers, the scenario's involve landing operations and nuclear attacks on cities... :-] These are again only facts, our current reality. I wonder if the UK or US (or NATO maybe ;-p) are currently preparing for, practicing a sea and air invasion or a nuclear attack on Buenos Aires, LOL ;-) :-]
(editado)
practicing a sea and air invasion or a nuclear attack on Buenos Aires, LOL ;-)
Correction: practicing a sea and air invasion or a nuclear attack on Buenos Aires, on a beach a few miles away from Buenos Aires, a couple of times in less then 5 years :/
Or even worse + more realistic, a number of real UK military simulations how to invade Argentina, and these simulations held on beaches of the Falkland Islands. I wonder what Argentinians would think of such a large invasion force practicing a few miles away of their border. But the thing is, even if they would do these simulations on the Falkland Islands, we all know the UK won't invade Argentina as they don't want more land of Argentina, Russia is completely different as we can see in Ukraine and other Russian neighboring countries!
(editado)
Correction: practicing a sea and air invasion or a nuclear attack on Buenos Aires, on a beach a few miles away from Buenos Aires, a couple of times in less then 5 years :/
Or even worse + more realistic, a number of real UK military simulations how to invade Argentina, and these simulations held on beaches of the Falkland Islands. I wonder what Argentinians would think of such a large invasion force practicing a few miles away of their border. But the thing is, even if they would do these simulations on the Falkland Islands, we all know the UK won't invade Argentina as they don't want more land of Argentina, Russia is completely different as we can see in Ukraine and other Russian neighboring countries!
(editado)
1000 prove of west European supidity:
Lebanese TV Host Rima Karaki Cuts Short London-Based Islamist's Interview following Insolent Remarks
This guy - Hani Al-Sibai is a conservative Sunni who emigrated to London after he was sentenced to 15 years in prison by an Egyptian court. Al-Sibai was accused of acting in the organization of Islamic Jihad.
Conclusion - the British government hides the Islamic jihadists
Lebanese TV Host Rima Karaki Cuts Short London-Based Islamist's Interview following Insolent Remarks
This guy - Hani Al-Sibai is a conservative Sunni who emigrated to London after he was sentenced to 15 years in prison by an Egyptian court. Al-Sibai was accused of acting in the organization of Islamic Jihad.
Conclusion - the British government hides the Islamic jihadists
Yeh, a military court in Egypt 1994 is something you should respect as being correct and totally free of political trails. Maybe you should also post the reason(s) why he could stay in England to make the story complete, instead of using such dumb propaganda style of posting nonsense.
And is it England you want to attack, or the muslim? Or both, as there is a muslim involved? Or maybe also all the west, just to make it even more dramatic ..... and more nonsense.
(editado)
And is it England you want to attack, or the muslim? Or both, as there is a muslim involved? Or maybe also all the west, just to make it even more dramatic ..... and more nonsense.
(editado)
"Conclusion - the British government hides the Islamic jihadists"
false, how did British government gov. come into that? :-o
...its more like Islamic jihadidsts hide in Britain, full stop and which is obvious.
Possibly UK-Egyptian extradition rules may not be so obvious...
...that was my assumpion, and it was right after 1 click wikipedia check-up:
he fled to the United Kingdom where he was later arrested and accused of membership in al-Jihad.[1][2] However, he remains in London, England as efforts to deport him have failed.[3]
(editado)
false, how did British government gov. come into that? :-o
...its more like Islamic jihadidsts hide in Britain, full stop and which is obvious.
Possibly UK-Egyptian extradition rules may not be so obvious...
...that was my assumpion, and it was right after 1 click wikipedia check-up:
he fled to the United Kingdom where he was later arrested and accused of membership in al-Jihad.[1][2] However, he remains in London, England as efforts to deport him have failed.[3]
(editado)
Crashed in Argentina, 10 dead people (2 argentinians pilots and 8 frenchies)
Florence Arthaud, Camille Muffat, Alexis Vastine ...
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-31809231
(editado)
Florence Arthaud, Camille Muffat, Alexis Vastine ...
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-31809231
(editado)
I got 30 days ban for posting youtube video about ukraine,
but others can post youtube video not about ukraine and it is ok? (2015-03-09 16:15:13)
It would be fair to announce in rules that posting any prorussian info is under censore and is reason for ban.
So question, can I post same youtube video as (2015-03-09 16:15:13) about Ukraine coup government aggresion in konstantinovka ? Killing hundreds of civilians (it is UA controlled terrority, so no separatists there).
Can I or it is true that it will be censored ?
Dont forget delete this post fast, so people can not read anything about applied censore in online game :-)
but others can post youtube video not about ukraine and it is ok? (2015-03-09 16:15:13)
It would be fair to announce in rules that posting any prorussian info is under censore and is reason for ban.
So question, can I post same youtube video as (2015-03-09 16:15:13) about Ukraine coup government aggresion in konstantinovka ? Killing hundreds of civilians (it is UA controlled terrority, so no separatists there).
Can I or it is true that it will be censored ?
Dont forget delete this post fast, so people can not read anything about applied censore in online game :-)
Crowd attacks army barracks in Konstantinovka after military vehicle kills 8yo girl
I am just wonder how long it will takes to western propaganda call that crowd "terrorists" :-DD
I am just wonder how long it will takes to western propaganda call that crowd "terrorists" :-DD
I got 30 days ban for posting youtube video about ukraine,
I'm pretty sure it was again because you keep refusing to follow the rules!
And the funny thing is, you know when posts are going to be deleted, you often write it yourself before it happens (just as you did right now), and still you have this little act of yours as if you are surprised when you get another ban for not following the rules. And you do all of this again right after the previous ban ended, as if you love the bans so much you want another one asap.
(editado)
I'm pretty sure it was again because you keep refusing to follow the rules!
And the funny thing is, you know when posts are going to be deleted, you often write it yourself before it happens (just as you did right now), and still you have this little act of yours as if you are surprised when you get another ban for not following the rules. And you do all of this again right after the previous ban ended, as if you love the bans so much you want another one asap.
(editado)
I got 30 days ban for posting youtube video about ukraine,
but others can post youtube video not about ukraine and it is ok? (2015-03-09 16:15:13)
I thought you could clearly understand that, so i hope for you that you are just acting in bad faith.
You was not banned because of posting a youtube link,
You was banned because of posting a link which wasn't an information from a professional media.
And as i know (i could made a mistake about that), the link posted by company is from a TV's interview.
I suppose it was a professional TV, so company wasn't of course banned because of that.
And finaly, if you had a 30 day's ban, it's because your preview ban was a 10 days ban and, as you know, next ban you will have (if you would) will be a 90's days ban, what ever you were just posting a link out of rules.
but others can post youtube video not about ukraine and it is ok? (2015-03-09 16:15:13)
I thought you could clearly understand that, so i hope for you that you are just acting in bad faith.
You was not banned because of posting a youtube link,
You was banned because of posting a link which wasn't an information from a professional media.
And as i know (i could made a mistake about that), the link posted by company is from a TV's interview.
I suppose it was a professional TV, so company wasn't of course banned because of that.
And finaly, if you had a 30 day's ban, it's because your preview ban was a 10 days ban and, as you know, next ban you will have (if you would) will be a 90's days ban, what ever you were just posting a link out of rules.
You was banned because of posting a link which wasn't an information from a professional media.
Why we can not just call it list of censored news :-)?
And to be honest I really dont know why I got ban, cos that rules are not really official you did them just because you want have formal reason to delete all "pro-russian crap" / not propaganda news.
It is easy ask everybody official professional news (professional means always western news, just few russian well-known news like RT.com or sputnik you had to accept) if there is not so huge infrastructure for "professional news" in totally destroyed part of Ukraine. I am sure, that after tens and tens artillery grenades or phosphor rocket attacks (Used in Ukraine (2014-2015) and banned by UNO) in Brussel will not let there any huge "profesional news" with all that ads, TVs and so. The point of war information is about truth, about pictures or videos or tens and tens recorded people statements and another facts from the war no matter how it is spreading to us. You like just that nice NEWS full of ads, made for two things, to earn money and to sell propaganda, as we know here in europe.
People are like that they can eat and are alive, government of Donetsk and Lugansk are happy that they are still able defend their country so yes, it is mistake that they do not establish nice news center for western guys instead of defending or medical expenditures.
I dont agree with you statement that army leaders who are posting war situation form the war zone via personal websites are not official professional media. Or that every journalist who doesnt have job in newspaper (news building were bombed too) can not make news like you want have.
Why we can not just call it list of censored news :-)?
And to be honest I really dont know why I got ban, cos that rules are not really official you did them just because you want have formal reason to delete all "pro-russian crap" / not propaganda news.
It is easy ask everybody official professional news (professional means always western news, just few russian well-known news like RT.com or sputnik you had to accept) if there is not so huge infrastructure for "professional news" in totally destroyed part of Ukraine. I am sure, that after tens and tens artillery grenades or phosphor rocket attacks (Used in Ukraine (2014-2015) and banned by UNO) in Brussel will not let there any huge "profesional news" with all that ads, TVs and so. The point of war information is about truth, about pictures or videos or tens and tens recorded people statements and another facts from the war no matter how it is spreading to us. You like just that nice NEWS full of ads, made for two things, to earn money and to sell propaganda, as we know here in europe.
People are like that they can eat and are alive, government of Donetsk and Lugansk are happy that they are still able defend their country so yes, it is mistake that they do not establish nice news center for western guys instead of defending or medical expenditures.
I dont agree with you statement that army leaders who are posting war situation form the war zone via personal websites are not official professional media. Or that every journalist who doesnt have job in newspaper (news building were bombed too) can not make news like you want have.
And to be honest I really dont know why I got ban, cos that rules are not really official you did them just because you want have formal reason to delete all "pro-russian crap" / not propaganda news.
oooh youre back...its official, it was discussed in our forum and applied. Deal with it or no, we dont have problem with it, forum was really nice place when you were silent ;)
oooh youre back...its official, it was discussed in our forum and applied. Deal with it or no, we dont have problem with it, forum was really nice place when you were silent ;)
I dont agree with you statement that army leaders who are posting war situation form the war zone via personal websites are not official professional media. Or that every journalist who doesnt have job in newspaper (news building were bombed too) can not make news like you want have.
Ok, you don't agree.
Ok, you don't agree.