Asunto: Random calibration needed?

Two identical matches, same players and same modules for both teams:

The first: 3-0 win 13 shots to 4 without any difficulties:

https://sokker.org/comment/matchID/39245340

The second: 0-4 loss with 6 shots to 17 in a wicked match in many aspects, such as nonsense backpasses and six missed shots in 1vs1 against keeper, by my players:

https://sokker.org/comment/matchID/39245341


Please enjoy the vision of the two matches to verify by yourself.


Considering these two twins matches as a proof, maybe considerable a lesser random influence and better calibration for the future? XD

Another proof this ME is broken...

But some smart managers will tell you it's your tactic :-s

Identical tactics for both team in both matches.

Two identical matches at first start.

Clearly the away advantage at play here.

Even worse.

Two wins by away team, so playing home Is such a disadvantage that justifies these two antithetics matches?

Moreover, playing home should be a vantage, not the opposite.

that was a lot of time that is like that!

Nope, not so much.

Instead i noticed in the Arcade match of this evening the same changing, with many more backpasses from midfield to defense.

So simply happened that in the pretty middle of the season, changings to the match engine have been implemented or experimented.

No problem, but advising before would have been better. :)

I remember in SEPTEMBER 2016
My team did 3 matches Vs Hyperion fc with same teams and same tactics in the same stade, and results was already amazing

04/09 19:30 W15
hyperion fc
Hyperion Fc H 1-1 Arcade

05/09 19:30 W15
hyperion fc
Hyperion Fc H 0-3 Arcade

06/09 19:30 W15
hyperion fc
Hyperion Fc H 7-0 Arcade