Asunto: [Bug] supporters choose No roof over roof same price

Look at all my home matches..... the tribunes i have most in of same size but without roof or benches instead seats gets preferred Even I put same price

The supporters have trouble understanding price and prefer the place cheapest back when you couldnt regulate yourself

But I rebuild my stadium. So only last home match is visible 100%.... but its bug since price regulations possible by managers themself

Look at all my home matches...
only you can see distribution of spectators on your stadium

The problem in the past was that certain supporters prefer certain places, and are willing to pay a lot for it, even if these are standing places or benches without roof. That made no sense at all.

Not sure if this is still happening.

It should be the other way, first the best places with roof, and the lower quality places are, the less spectators want to sit or stand there, and never for the same price or higher as best quality in the stadium. If the price of lower quality places are set the same as highest quality, spectators should not buy tickets for those places.

Or maybe prices should be set automatically for lower quality seats and standings, based on the price managers ask for their best places in the stadium. Then it doesn't matter spectators prefer lower quality places, they also pay less.
.
(editado)

maybe it's a matter of weather? if there is warm, sunny weather spectators are less eager to sit under roof

no its also such case on rainy days

ok, show me spectators distribution from this match:
https://sokker.org/comment?matchID=42093208

same, but the 6 end tribunes didnt have any roof, only the favourite 2 side tribunes

that bottom-left stand looks good, I mean relatively small amount of spectators choose it on rainy weather
only that mid-left seems to be not working like one would expect

all 6 end tribunes were without roof, also right top, left top, left bottom at that point.... i just rebuild to add roofs.... as even they choose the bad seats, you get higher total attendance if all seater if i watch how my league has been and my past with 6 tribunes without roof and very bad attendance even dominating the league

they simply dont choice right at the stadium, not in total, from my observations and ive been at it long time....... my dad has 60k all roof, i only used to have 24k roof and from my 80k stadium 30k was benches, i had 30-40% less attendance then him all times, no matter who of us was in top, and i have 11 titles, he have 1

so is small bug since no attendance problems except preference at the stand, but has been a bug for as long as prices were adjustable

But explain bottom right..... most prefered even having same price as other better places

in case of non-rainy weather they preferred benches (those might be just "I prefer bench" spectators and they have only 1 stand for it) over seats without roof, which were chosen over seats with roof (currently I explain it as they prefer no roof in warm weather, although must be more than that)

but in case of rainy weather they chosen benches (again - those are probably fans preferring benches and they dont have only one bench stand to choose from), then seats with roof and seats without roof after that, which seems logical

Its bug, you cant explain it.

Cause if they prefer those places at same price, why there always Come more with more seats and more roof then. I had benches on 3 stands before rebuilding

I never said it isn't, I am not trying to explain it, I am trying to understand it more precisely so it could be properly explained to developers

but you see that on rainy weather that stand without roof in the corner "acted" properly, right?