Asunto: »[JNRS]Juniors

Option 2 is what the number means (in weeks).

ok cheers mate, so would that mean the longer the better?

I got just the one junior again, at least i got something worth keeping this time though!

Adequate (34) --> should hopefully be some skill increases along the way! ;)

Depends really. I think I'd rather get good (3) players every week than adequate (30). If they are talented though, longer can be better.

so far i've got an adequate (20 something). so it's pretty much down to luck, not to the extent of hattrick though.

Depends really. I think I'd rather get good (3) players every week than adequate (30). If they are talented though, longer can be better.
---
I agree but being my first junior worth keeping i was happy with just that fact! =P

Six spots. Will expand to 9 once I get 6 I'm happy with. And so on....

The slow approach I've adopted, where you increase by 1 every other week (according to increases in sponsor money) is good for finances.

I cant wait for my Solid (16) to come should be a nice player hopefully when i can have him possibly a future England player.

Here was my adequate +50% junior

Brett Thompson, age: 17
value: 13 050 £, wage: 330 £
club: Forest Reserves, country: England
very good form

hopeless stamina, tragic keeper
poor pace, tragic defender
tragic technique, unsatisfactory playmaker
adequate passing, average striker

I take it you will be training him?

I'm full on striker trainees at the moment so will not be.

Boo hiss. You should just ditch a Pole.

Ken Blayney weak 7 reject
Trevor Purkess good 17 reject
Robert Carr hopeless 19 reject
Matthew Armstrong good 28 reject
Steve Caig weak 32 reject
Adam Norman weak 34 reject

this weeks selection of youthful talent

Mario Sherwood average 10
Jerry Samuel poor 14
Sean Dyer weak 15
Tony Lestina adequate 15
Matthew Howe average 19

I think I'll keep the long term weaks as they will improve and get rid of the others