Asunto: »[NON-NT]Nanook

YES. My lack of capabilities are apparent even to people who describes themselves as not very smart.

Can there be any doubt left that I am utterly inappropriate to be NT coach????

Can I give you my non vote once again?

I DEMAND THAT YOU GIVE ME YOUR NON-VOTE? WHO ELSE IS WORTHY BUT I?

PS The bolding and capitalizing and stuff is in honor of the Tea Party in the US, who seem to confuse volume with logic in political discourse. I admit to their tenacity (despite their idiocy). Since they also are not worthy to lead in any way, I believe we are kindred spirits in our incapacity, so I shall model my campaign for now on their model.
(editado)

1) the bolding and capitalizing is against forum statutes. Your ignorance of this fact is yet additional proof of your inadequacy. I know this because I wrote them you bastage.

-overusing capital letters in titles of threads or in posts
-using enlarged font, colors or other special characters without any purpose

2) I agree with you that you are indeed utterly inappropriate.

3) it could be rat, not cat. That's cheaper and in abundance.

I do not believe they are overused, and they CERTAINLY are not "without any purpose" as I explained said purpose in my post.

Can't be rat. Not sinewy enough. Dog, perhaps.

You are coming up to your 6th year of non campaigning. How do you feel this campaign has evolved during this time?

I have a porpoise

Frankly, I am shocked that you would even ask that question. First, please note that I was much more earnest about developing a formal campaign platform in the past. Feel free to scan through the earlier pages of this thread, and you'll see a very deliberate attempt to explain to the US community to provide my insight into any number of issues not particularly germane to my unsuitability as NT coach. Some examples -

1) I believe that the Swine Flu actually is the beginning stages of an invasion from little aliens from the planet Flugenspaskie, best battled by a newly formed Earth Planetary Environmentally Consciencious Appropriately Impressive Defense Establishment (EPECAIDE for short).
2) NT players should wear spandex AND cheerleader outfits, and be forced to be hygenic.
3) Cheese is cool
4) Chuck Norris. Yes, Chuck Norris. He suffices.
5) We should eat children to combat the potato famine

This time around, I am not adding any particularly impressive pearls of wisdom, since the US Community of Users (USCoU) seems confident that I am in fact not qualified to do much more than log in and rant. So I shall (for this season) merely opine about nothing.

Much like George W. Bush's presidency. And the interstellar vacuum (which, come to think of it, is remarkably similar to George W. Bush's presidency).

There's a potato famine?

I believe in always being prepared, so as to avoid any suggestion that when the need arises that I was sluggish. I therefore also suggest buying igloo starter equipment, as the next ice age approacheth.

In honor of my regular attempt to ensure that I am not voted NT coach, I am going to regularly spew Mystery Questions of Life that I readily admit I cannot answer. I leave it to you (particularly the Llama) to correct my ignorance, so that NEXT season I'll have another set of reason I cannot be deemed appropriate to run the NT.

When driving down the highway, you often see an occasional sneaker sitting on the side of the road.

WHERE DID THE OTHER SNEAKER GO?

I think it is time you just shut up and run and see how many non-votes you get.

I refuse to run to get non-votes. My concern is that I would, in fact, get enough non-non-votes to be elected, and as I have already publicly stated, "If drafted, I will not run; if nominated, I will not accept; if elected, I will not serve." If I get the most votes, I will ignore the team, as previously and repeatedly and nauseatingly promised, thereby doing only slightly better than Llama did but not yet good enough to demonstrate America's Clear Superiority In All Things (hereinafter "ACSIAT").

So you are saying nothing will change? Got it... Rock on Mario (oh oops, here comes a ban, I supported another candidate in a candidacy thread..or did I?)

Pretty sure you get a non-ban in this case.

I demand that a non-ban be issued tout suite!