Asunto: »[Junior]USA Youth Roll Call

Check out week 12

Ari Goodson good 2 Reject
Tracy Barlow solid 11 Reject
Cecil Dole solid 12 Reject
Eddy Busch solid 12 Reject
Douglas Ali solid 12 Reject
Earl Hejduk excellent 16 Reject
Nicholas Friedland good 17 Reject
Joe Floyd weak 27 Reject
Adin Kante weak 29 Reject
Wallace Holt good 31 Reject
Walker Ingels adequate 32 Reject
(editado)

I believe in quality, not quantity... :-)

Morgan Jeffries formidable 5 Reject
Zachary Pence incredible 10 Reject
Quincy Harding formidable 19 Reject
Emanuel Chase adequate 21 Reject
Gimel Kinsey weak 24 Reject
Jed Torre good 24 Reject

Mine have talent. :)

Randal Clanton very good 1
Ace Echefu good 2
Caesar Black solid 4
Neal O'Neil formidable 5
Willy Capano solid 5
Bartholomew McNaughty very good 8
Daryl Grayson good 9
Terrance Thornton adequate 9 Reject
Karl Dell adequate 12
Les Finley solid 15 Reject
Rusty McMahon solid 15
Ray Galloway adequate 15 Reject
Ted Carroll good 17
Aubrey Lemond average 20
Dill Tasman adequate 20
Elvin Shore good 24
Alvis Pickens hopeless 31
Edwin Kreis weak 33

Hank Barry very good 1 Reject
Allen Newman solid 1 Reject
Ritchie Jennings solid 1 Reject
Otto Gardner excellent 3 Reject
Bobby Woodworth brilliant 3 Reject
Gimel Coyote solid 7 Reject
Darnell Manning very good 8 Reject
Kenyon Wilkinson formidable 11 Reject
Claudio Lisi very good 12 Reject
Edgar Rhodes solid 12 Reject
Erwin Cooley very good 14 Reject
Teddy Wixson solid 15 Reject
Dace Reese good 20 Reject
Preston Tiller good 21 Reject
Casper Mann good 22 Reject
(editado)

Is 3.4 weeks considered talented, because that's what Pence and Harding have...? :P

that was obnoxious, cody. Just obnoxious lol

grandma's boy status haha

"what does 'high score' mean? new high score, is that bad? what does that mean? did I break it?"

They both came out excellent and solid, but I didn't feel like changing it in SM.

4-week talent keeper

Kasey Estill, age: 18
Value: 133750 $, wage: 1675 $
Team: Ball Crushers, country: USA
Form: very good

Tactical Discipline: tragic (0 Experience, 0 Team Work)

Stamina: poor, Keeper: solid
Pace: good, Defender: tragic
Technique: tragic, Playmaker: hopeless
Passing: adequate, Striker: tragic


Junior History with Club
Initial Skill: 6, Final Skill: 9 (+50.00%), weeks in Juniors: 8
Talent in Juniors: 4 weeks/pop


(Player posting generated by Sokker Manager)



and then some random n00b.

Randal Jeter, age: 18
Value: 39000 $, wage: 725 $
Team: Ball Crushers, country: USA
Form: very good

Tactical Discipline: tragic (0 Experience, 0 Team Work)

Stamina: tragic, Keeper: hopeless
Pace: tragic, Defender: adequate
Technique: good, Playmaker: adequate
Passing: tragic, Striker: tragic


Junior History with Club
Initial Skill: 5, Final Skill: 7 (+57.14%), weeks in Juniors: 7
Talent in Juniors: 7 weeks/pop


(Player posting generated by Sokker Manager)
(editado)

so the score is 11 4 week talents to 2 3.4 week talents?
(editado)

What a waste of talent: 4.5 weeks per pop .. came out "good":

Randolph Carpenter, age: 20
value: 27 000 $, wage: 600 $
club: Lumen, country: USA
very good form, tragic tactical discipline

tragic stamina, tragic keeper
poor pace, adequate defender
unsatisfactory technique, unsatisfactory playmaker
hopeless passing, adequate striker

On the TL .. for $1

Bummer distribution. Formidable 4wk talent:

Erwin Bernal, age: 18
Value: 109750 $, wage: 1500 $
Team: Zamboni, country: USA
Form: very good

Tactical Discipline: tragic (0 Exp, 0 TW)

Stamina: poor, Keeper: hopeless
Pace: very good, Defender: tragic
Technique: adequate, Playmaker: excellent
Passing: hopeless, Striker: hopeless


Junior History with Club
Initial Skill: 6, Final Skill: 11 (+50.00%), weeks in Juniors: 16
Talent in Juniors: 4 weeks/pop


(Player posting generated by Sokker Manager)

for u maybe, in general hes a great passing trainee i think

Good. Maybe someone will want him. Seems like a good player. I just can't use him.

Do you need one? I have an almost identical 18 year old with 4 week talent I'd love to sell for a fair price.

Do I need what? I'm trying to get rid of this one. Maybe I'm misunderstanding.