Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Asunto: National Team
I understand, but it was only about two minutes and you've already written ;)
Qualification for the World Cup:
Group B
Hrvatska - : - België 11:59 SK-time
Canada - : - Australia 17:59 SK-time
Crna Gora - : - Pilipinas 11:59 SK-time
Group D with borkos ;)
Sverige - : - Italia 11:59 SK-time
Group B
Hrvatska - : - België 11:59 SK-time
Canada - : - Australia 17:59 SK-time
Crna Gora - : - Pilipinas 11:59 SK-time
Group D with borkos ;)
Sverige - : - Italia 11:59 SK-time
CANADA - AUSTRALIA 1 - 4
So we carry mandatory three points to home. In the evening I will write something to match.
I'm not sure about Griffiths on that position...but since it worked...:)
congrats, great start!
congrats, great start!
Yes, definitely. He played great and in my opinion edge is his position ;). Thank you.
cometer [del] para
Wo-10 [del]
Yes, definitely. He played great and in my opinion edge is his position ;).
I don't think anyone would disagree with that but I think borkos was getting at the depth of Griffiths more than how wide because I was thinking a similar thing.
I also felt our defense was horribly exposed with the massive holes and huge gaps between our midfield and defense. Against a better tactic or side we'd have found ourselves under a lot more pressure.
Otherwise a good start :).
I don't think anyone would disagree with that but I think borkos was getting at the depth of Griffiths more than how wide because I was thinking a similar thing.
I also felt our defense was horribly exposed with the massive holes and huge gaps between our midfield and defense. Against a better tactic or side we'd have found ourselves under a lot more pressure.
Otherwise a good start :).
Yes, our defense has been a thorn in the heel. Often deteriorated, it is true. Into the next match we will improve it.
Well, I take that into account. But where do I stand him .. in your opinion?
cometer [del] para
Wo-10 [del]
a lot depends on what the opposition do with their defense. If it's deep, then playing him short and wide isn't going to help. If the opposition uses a 5th man wide then it's not going to help having him extremely wide.
It's a balancing act but usually I'd be placing them as high as possible to get in behind the defense rather than sit around and then cross the ball back to our centre midfielder.
Again, it's your decision. You bring a whole new look on tactics that brings about new ideas and ways of tactic building. Against Canada Griffiths worked but perhaps given their depth of their defense had he been pushed further forward still we may have created more.
Your choice in the end, predictability is what we're trying to avoid so the choice to place him short at least you know he can play that position.
It's a balancing act but usually I'd be placing them as high as possible to get in behind the defense rather than sit around and then cross the ball back to our centre midfielder.
Again, it's your decision. You bring a whole new look on tactics that brings about new ideas and ways of tactic building. Against Canada Griffiths worked but perhaps given their depth of their defense had he been pushed further forward still we may have created more.
Your choice in the end, predictability is what we're trying to avoid so the choice to place him short at least you know he can play that position.