Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Asunto: National Team
he have team from 2011, and he thinks that he can tell me that i have crap opinions?anyway he can make what he want here, but will not be good times for him or for Australia NT if he dont change his behavior.
cometer [del] para
Glazy [del]
Let's not go down this path.
Yes there have been some ordinary mistakes in some of the tactics in the past (Crna Gora, Denmark etc) but tbh this result was not one of them as such. I have been highly critical in the association forum and I saw an improvement at least this time. Sure there's still probably a few areas of improvement but there's nothing to be too critical of here. 15 shots to 1, 20% pith and we still should have scored at least once. You replay that and we win 3 or 4 to 0.
You're kidding yourself if you don't think a winger is appropriate against a weaker team. Perhaps you haven't seen the players at our disposal but wingers are still effective as a means to create chances. I use a winger for the majority of my club games and don't have too many problems converting from crosses.
I don't approve of the initial way that Wo-10 responded but tbh it's easy to criticise when you're not in the hot seat.
The current match engine punishes sides if they don't convert and seems to be very tight at controlling the results of games which leads to these sort of results occurring more frequently. So long as you avoid gifting away easy chances to be robbed, when a result like this comes along no tactic is going to help.
Yes there have been some ordinary mistakes in some of the tactics in the past (Crna Gora, Denmark etc) but tbh this result was not one of them as such. I have been highly critical in the association forum and I saw an improvement at least this time. Sure there's still probably a few areas of improvement but there's nothing to be too critical of here. 15 shots to 1, 20% pith and we still should have scored at least once. You replay that and we win 3 or 4 to 0.
You're kidding yourself if you don't think a winger is appropriate against a weaker team. Perhaps you haven't seen the players at our disposal but wingers are still effective as a means to create chances. I use a winger for the majority of my club games and don't have too many problems converting from crosses.
I don't approve of the initial way that Wo-10 responded but tbh it's easy to criticise when you're not in the hot seat.
The current match engine punishes sides if they don't convert and seems to be very tight at controlling the results of games which leads to these sort of results occurring more frequently. So long as you avoid gifting away easy chances to be robbed, when a result like this comes along no tactic is going to help.
I find funny how the managers who critize others the most are also the ones who use 1-2 tactics in both club and NT..and I don't mean just you..
You said he needs to play high defense..he did play high defense..so you either didn't watch the match, or you are blind or you just want to be antagonistic for no reason..
You said he needs to play high defense..he did play high defense..so you either didn't watch the match, or you are blind or you just want to be antagonistic for no reason..
i agree with you but in my nt matches when i was playing against weaker teams i don't score too much goals when i played with some type of tactics.I didn't want to critic woo tactic but i say just my opinion and he had a disgrace atitude.Is a reason for this scoring chance fact were you have 2X chances and opponent 1 or 5 and you fail... is not always engine fault.
high defense dont means just that he move at middle of field his defense, i would to say other things...i can''t explain right now and i dont use 1,2 tactics lol
i always edited my tactics in different matches, but in club dont interested me results coz i training my youth.And at NT i use tactic with my players shape let me... i have a lot of defenders and and atts, but not so good mids, and i try to compensating.I always read sugestions and i dont mad when someone is not agree with me because i know that no1 who love my nt want that i fail.
i always edited my tactics in different matches, but in club dont interested me results coz i training my youth.And at NT i use tactic with my players shape let me... i have a lot of defenders and and atts, but not so good mids, and i try to compensating.I always read sugestions and i dont mad when someone is not agree with me because i know that no1 who love my nt want that i fail.
I understand that Woo is your and cometer friend but try to help him if you see that something is not working so good, that means evolution.
I haven't seen the game because of internet issues, but I don't understand why Buttler got any time on the field - he's not NT level.
Weak Buttler + Haereiti whose striker is very low for this level = problems
Weak Buttler + Haereiti whose striker is very low for this level = problems
cometer [del] para
Glazy [del]
I understand that Woo is your and cometer friend but try to help him if you see that something is not working so good, that means evolution.
See this is where you need to sometimes learn to ensure that what you say is correct because if you knew anything of the situation atm you'd be aware of what I'm saying behind closed doors (i.e in the safety of the association forum and skmails).
Should leave me out of this as I'm a neutral. I only came in when it became an attack about who played longer. Length has nothing to do with it and people are so quick to jump to that. You could be here 10 years and never touch the game and that doesn't make you better than someone around 1 year and who has.
Yes I support our NT manager, that's what any user should do when someone is elected. I don't support the way he responded and yes there are things which I have again highlighted that probably would have made a difference today but seriously when you have 15 shots you should score at least once, especially when you see some of the shots we had. It didn't happen, we move on.
See this is where you need to sometimes learn to ensure that what you say is correct because if you knew anything of the situation atm you'd be aware of what I'm saying behind closed doors (i.e in the safety of the association forum and skmails).
Should leave me out of this as I'm a neutral. I only came in when it became an attack about who played longer. Length has nothing to do with it and people are so quick to jump to that. You could be here 10 years and never touch the game and that doesn't make you better than someone around 1 year and who has.
Yes I support our NT manager, that's what any user should do when someone is elected. I don't support the way he responded and yes there are things which I have again highlighted that probably would have made a difference today but seriously when you have 15 shots you should score at least once, especially when you see some of the shots we had. It didn't happen, we move on.
cometer [del] para
borkos007
I haven't seen the game because of internet issues, but I don't understand why Buttler got any time on the field - he's not NT level.
Weak Buttler + Haereiti whose striker is very low for this level = problems
Normally, I'd agree borkos, but the current match engine, striking skill is pretty well useless. A striker is either a good finisher or not, it doesn't matter of his striking level too greatly.
In saying that Giann, Leijer would have both coughed up just as much.
Perhaps Barnes and Huxley may have been the go, regardless of form but even so 15 shots you'd expect 1 goal.
Weak Buttler + Haereiti whose striker is very low for this level = problems
Normally, I'd agree borkos, but the current match engine, striking skill is pretty well useless. A striker is either a good finisher or not, it doesn't matter of his striking level too greatly.
In saying that Giann, Leijer would have both coughed up just as much.
Perhaps Barnes and Huxley may have been the go, regardless of form but even so 15 shots you'd expect 1 goal.
cometer i didn't want to blame him, or to show him that im better.I'm not better because i didnt proove that yet.But my response was a reaction at how he replyed me.i hope that you dont hate me for that, and if Australia didn't interested me i surrely ignoring it, but this team excepting Jamaica is only one that i support and thats all.When your supported team when you see that have problems, you dont try to find out what is happening?
(editado)
(editado)
I do not have on the choice. Form went down :( .. and Leijer (inj.)
And in case Buttler I decided because of form. Look at the game, not playing badly. Last time he also gave the goal ;))
(editado)
And in case Buttler I decided because of form. Look at the game, not playing badly. Last time he also gave the goal ;))
(editado)
cometer [del] para
Glazy [del]
I don't hate you, but at the same time lowering yourself to the same level of conduct doesn't help the situation. Criticise constructively all you want, I do it most weeks, but pulling stuff in about time spent in the game isn't going to do much to help.
I and probably the rest of the community enjoy that you support our NT and we're happy to hear comments, but we don't want verbal assaults that end with P1 - insults P2, P2 insults back, P1 insults P2 to get back again etc etc.
I and probably the rest of the community enjoy that you support our NT and we're happy to hear comments, but we don't want verbal assaults that end with P1 - insults P2, P2 insults back, P1 insults P2 to get back again etc etc.
Explain to me one thing. Why are you talking about ?? ... I'm talking with the Australians liked, but your criticism does not interest me.
cometer [del] para
Wo-10 [del]
It should interest you. It gives another perspective to the match. If it's personal insults it's good enough to ignore, but you should be prepared to take advice from anyone. Advice can't hurt if it's put in the right context.