Asunto: National Team

It should interest you. It gives another perspective to the match. If it's personal insults it's good enough to ignore, but you should be prepared to take advice from anyone. Advice can't hurt if it's put in the right context.

show me where i was critic about your tactic in my first post.

cometer when i made verbal assault in first post?what critical unconstructively i expressed? and why you sayd that i am lowering myself?
all my crap behaviors was a reaction from who reply, so i will delete my reaction:)
(editado)

cometer when i made verbal assault in first post?

I didn't say you did, but it's an area we don't want to go down.

what critical unconstructively i expressed?

The part regarding that Wo-10 had only been here 1 year was not useful in any sense really. Yes it was probably in retaliation to Wo-10's aggressive response (which as I've already said is uncalled for).

Edit: Anyway I'm stepping out of this now. I've said what I thought I needed to prevent things from escalating but perhaps I've stayed discussing for too long and so I'm hopping out and moving on now :).

(editado)

This has nothing to do with being friend with somebody..you said he has to play high defense which he did, but then you don't want to elaborate on it further (i can''t explain right now) , which suggests you are just making stuff up..You have't come up with 1 specific thing what was wrong with the tactic..and now you are deleting your posts..?!?!

I've checked your recent matches in club and NT and you used 1 tactic, that's all I need to know...To come here and critize others, when you yourself don't do much tactically is at least bit weird to me..

Why would you give borkos +1 for what he wrote about the strikers? You have acces to Australian database? You know the skills of the players? Another example you just want to be antagonistic without knowing the issue..
(editado)

'The part regarding that Wo-10 had only been here 1 year was not useful in any sense really. Yes it was probably in retaliation to Wo-10's aggressive response (which as I've already said is uncalled for).'

i didnt sayd that he wasn't usefull

'This has nothing to do with being friend with somebody..you said he has to play high defense which he did, but than you don't want to elaborate on it further (i can''t explain right now) , which suggests you are just making stuff up..

I've checked your recent matches in club and NT and you used 1 tactic, that's all I need to know...To come here and critize others, when you yourself don't do much tactically is at least bit weird to me..

Why would you give borkos +1 for what he wrote about the strikers? You have acces to Australian database? You know the skills of the players? Another example you just want to be antagonistic without knowing the issue.. '

at first alingment i dont how explain that because you had right in the database problem,i dont know skills.In my club matches i dont interest me result because i need to train 10 mids so i shall playing with a tactic with 5 mid.
in Nt matches i play 1 formula (4-3-1-2) over 3 matches, but if you look closely you should observed that they are not possitioning in same place.i play same formula because players condition don't allow me to play other formula for moment and i need to adaptating.

I give borkos +1 just because i saw that Butler wasn't so effective but that maybe i had 3 discussing 'opponents' and here i was subjective:)

Ok thanks, you've basically confirmed all my points..

Gian has formidable form and Barnes has excellent?!?! Gian has double the value, and significantly higher skills than Butler. Barnes another level again. When you know the striking levels of Butler and Haerati, I don't think you can complain that you didn't score goals. Form ain't going to paper over those skills. They are div II skills, let alone NT level. Barnes rating higher than both gives you the tip.

Look on the bright side... you can't get sacked mid-season :)

Hayden Butler, age: 25
club: Devil`s Angels United, country: Australia,
value: 1 776 800 AU$, wage: 17 800 AU$,

Mason Giannakopoulos, age: 26 , sum(76)
club: Steel Fury, country: Australia,
value: 2 831 600 AU$, wage: 36 480 AU$,

Luke Barnes, age: 29
club: Larikan FC, country: Australia,
value: 3 562 800 AU$

They are div II skills, let alone NT level. Barnes rating higher than both gives you the tip.

Well I disagree because I've got worse in my squad that regularly play (and score), but I do agree that both Barnes should have started, possibly with Haereiti.

Sorry uber but I'm no fan of Giannakopoulos. His accuracy is pretty ordinary most of the time ;). Still he's a better choice then Butler I'd agree.

butler isnt even 3x magical ._.

I won't argue with you Cometer. The amount of 1-on-1's he's missed for my team already is amazing. Tonight another example...

I stand behind this decision. And he played one half and the second played Barnes :))

Gian you could argue. Not playing Barnes is criminal IMO. Still... its your NT :)

Barnes in 10 form and Gian in 11 form ... who is better? :) ... Barnes ;))

Barnes is better than Gian and both are better than Butler even with that "low" form.
In the Australia game:
Buttler = 72
Barnes = 77
In tonight's club game:
Gian = 77

I think you overestimate the effect of form. Compared to the rest of Australian strikers, I would play Barnes in every game. I might think about others if his form was 0 and there were no injuries!

I'm not sure if this helps or not, but as owner of both Huxley and Barnes, they both have the exact same skill level over the 3 main skills, But Huxley has better secondary skills.

How's that for throwing a spanner in the works