Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Asunto: National Team
Sriram [del] para
Achmid [del]
Just change the language and compare with your own players.
As I remember it's in SK Viewer...hm...right...forgot about it ^^
Ok...few new players in NT :p
Still must get 'few' skills...and please don't get mad if I'll ask for skills that you already sent me...I had a little problem - when I was writing skills from txt to excel, my computer got shuted down :p txt saved[few players skills were already in excel so I lost them] and excel...didn't. :p
(editado)
Still must get 'few' skills...and please don't get mad if I'll ask for skills that you already sent me...I had a little problem - when I was writing skills from txt to excel, my computer got shuted down :p txt saved[few players skills were already in excel so I lost them] and excel...didn't. :p
(editado)
Erm...don't get mad after matc hagainst Chile. It'll be a quite risky tactic...though...it should work. I must try something like that before Qualification games, and that's the only friendly before them...though I think it'll end as a win...:p
:D
Don't worry, it won't be 8-1-1 or 1-1-8 tactic[hm...not sure we have 8 strikers at all ;)]. Though I don't remember Australia playing like that...and it suits Chile's tactic best. :]
Don't worry, it won't be 8-1-1 or 1-1-8 tactic[hm...not sure we have 8 strikers at all ;)]. Though I don't remember Australia playing like that...and it suits Chile's tactic best. :]
Argh...you crashed my beautiful plan! I wanted to do it, but if you know about it...I'll have to crush you with normal tactic. :p
i'm not the coach, and i dont think Maqoma looks in here.......
you can still do it!
also, if he does look in here, he will assume that because you said that you wouldn't do it and he has seen it, that you wont do it. but because he thinks that you wont do it because he has seen it, you will be able to do it to surprise him.. but me saying that you will be able to do it because he thinks you wont do it so it would allow you to do it for suprise might make him think that you might still do it which means you can't do it.. but again me saying that might make him think that you wont do it because i he has seen that you wont do it....... it continues.
just use it as surprise.. no doubt, if Maqoma reads this, he will be caught in the everlasting, infinte vortex of IF's and wont be able to change the tactics.
you can still do it!
also, if he does look in here, he will assume that because you said that you wouldn't do it and he has seen it, that you wont do it. but because he thinks that you wont do it because he has seen it, you will be able to do it to surprise him.. but me saying that you will be able to do it because he thinks you wont do it so it would allow you to do it for suprise might make him think that you might still do it which means you can't do it.. but again me saying that might make him think that you wont do it because i he has seen that you wont do it....... it continues.
just use it as surprise.. no doubt, if Maqoma reads this, he will be caught in the everlasting, infinte vortex of IF's and wont be able to change the tactics.
Ok, tactic and line up for Chile made, I'll send info about NT call ups for owners of players. :)
Now time for Argentina..
Now time for Argentina..
I would like to invite people from Australia to official forum of Qualifications Group G. :)
Tomorrow first match, though only friendly for Australia.
Australia will play with a new tactic and new formation, never used before.
Australia is 46th in ranks, with 1236.15 points. We'll see how it will look after the season...:)
Tomorrow first match, though only friendly for Australia.
Australia will play with a new tactic and new formation, never used before.
Australia is 46th in ranks, with 1236.15 points. We'll see how it will look after the season...:)
Cloete [del] para
borkos007
err why did the CM and DM play in a line like 5 metres away from each other? That's just stupid as the DM would never pass it to the CM. If you're going to do a tactic like that you should play an AM so he's way further up the pitch.
Also the 3 striekrs holding hands probably wasn't necessary. 3 in a row like that next to each other is a bit of a waste.
Anyway, a nice win :)
(editado)
Also the 3 striekrs holding hands probably wasn't necessary. 3 in a row like that next to each other is a bit of a waste.
Anyway, a nice win :)
(editado)
cometer [del] para
borkos007
it would be right wouldnt it, i can guess the score correct when theres nothing huge up for grabs. Anyway few questions.
1) What was the idea behind 3 strikers basically sitting on top of each other?
2) Why was the DM and the MC marking each other.
3) I dislike the defensive setup. You still seem to not have got the idea that you need to fill in the back square as we had defenders almost back in line with ando. A better side would have taken advantage of this and strikers would have gotten shots off from inside the box before the defenders reached them. Also 3 defenders in the backline hmmm i dunno.
Apart from those you got the win, but it wasn't really convincing.
1) What was the idea behind 3 strikers basically sitting on top of each other?
2) Why was the DM and the MC marking each other.
3) I dislike the defensive setup. You still seem to not have got the idea that you need to fill in the back square as we had defenders almost back in line with ando. A better side would have taken advantage of this and strikers would have gotten shots off from inside the box before the defenders reached them. Also 3 defenders in the backline hmmm i dunno.
Apart from those you got the win, but it wasn't really convincing.
1) What was the idea behind 3 strikers basically sitting on top of each other?
Ok, here it goes. Coach of Chile was re-elected, and last season he used same tactic for long time, I was sure he won't change it, so I used 3 forwards in centre - watch what was defence of Chile placed before this match. If he wouldn't change it, it would be much higher than 2:1...anyway - we had a penalty too :-P
3) I dislike the defensive setup. You still seem to not have got the idea that you need to fill in the back square as we had defenders almost back in line with ando.
I can't comment that on forum, cause opponent can see this :> I'll reply you on sk-mail.
Also 3 defenders in the backline hmmm i dunno.
It was only due to Chiles previous tactic, don't worry. :)
Apart from those you got the win, but it wasn't really convincing.
I must agree with that.
@Cloete
err why did the CM and DM play in a line like 5 metres away from each other? That's just stupid as the DM would never pass it to the CM. If you're going to do a tactic like that you should play an AM so he's way further up the pitch.
DM ought to defend near defense, and CM to help him a little and make through passes, after tackling the ball in center of pitch
Also the 3 striekrs holding hands probably wasn't necessary. 3 in a row like that next to each other is a bit of a waste.
Don't worry - I just wanted to check which one of them should play, I still don't have updated skills of Hrehoresin, but it looks that he improved nicely. And he is in good form...
Anyway, a nice win :)
Too low :/
Ok, here it goes. Coach of Chile was re-elected, and last season he used same tactic for long time, I was sure he won't change it, so I used 3 forwards in centre - watch what was defence of Chile placed before this match. If he wouldn't change it, it would be much higher than 2:1...anyway - we had a penalty too :-P
3) I dislike the defensive setup. You still seem to not have got the idea that you need to fill in the back square as we had defenders almost back in line with ando.
I can't comment that on forum, cause opponent can see this :> I'll reply you on sk-mail.
Also 3 defenders in the backline hmmm i dunno.
It was only due to Chiles previous tactic, don't worry. :)
Apart from those you got the win, but it wasn't really convincing.
I must agree with that.
@Cloete
err why did the CM and DM play in a line like 5 metres away from each other? That's just stupid as the DM would never pass it to the CM. If you're going to do a tactic like that you should play an AM so he's way further up the pitch.
DM ought to defend near defense, and CM to help him a little and make through passes, after tackling the ball in center of pitch
Also the 3 striekrs holding hands probably wasn't necessary. 3 in a row like that next to each other is a bit of a waste.
Don't worry - I just wanted to check which one of them should play, I still don't have updated skills of Hrehoresin, but it looks that he improved nicely. And he is in good form...
Anyway, a nice win :)
Too low :/