Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Asunto: National Team
You can only play like that if you have fast defenders. Don't know how is the case with Australian defenders though...
With slow defenders placed high and fast strikers on the same line from opposite team, you know the outcome :)
With slow defenders placed high and fast strikers on the same line from opposite team, you know the outcome :)
it has some advantages and also some disadventages. But you also haven't got so good attackers to score goals when they received passes at the half line and they half a pitch to run across
Most of our players either are lacking in pace, or are lacking in technique, which is a big turnoff.
And the best players are lacking in stamina. We have a good enough "primary stat" squad, but our secondaries absolutely royally suck, apart from four or five players.
And the best players are lacking in stamina. We have a good enough "primary stat" squad, but our secondaries absolutely royally suck, apart from four or five players.
i don't say that Australia should play like Nederland's tactic.
Not so higher.
But i'm not prefer when Defs are staying all match at the penalty box's line.
When the ball is at opposite penalty box I think they should be nearer half line than teh penalty box
(editado)
Not so higher.
But i'm not prefer when Defs are staying all match at the penalty box's line.
When the ball is at opposite penalty box I think they should be nearer half line than teh penalty box
(editado)
Hmm, definitely needs to be looked into. Also, the space between the two center-backs is a bit much.
Everything'll be looked into before the Croatia match.
Everything'll be looked into before the Croatia match.
borkos007 para
Sriram [del]
Yeah :)
But I think that big tactic change should be made on next friendly :)
Anyway....maybe it''s time to change tactic?
4-4-2?
3-4-3?
:D
But I think that big tactic change should be made on next friendly :)
Anyway....maybe it''s time to change tactic?
4-4-2?
3-4-3?
:D
Sriram [del] para
borkos007
Nah, for our players, the 4-1-2-2-1 is perfect.
It fits perfectly, it really does. Now the challenge is making it work efficiently, which is what we should be looking at.
It fits perfectly, it really does. Now the challenge is making it work efficiently, which is what we should be looking at.
borkos007 para
Sriram [del]
I'm not sure...we have better mids than Atts so I think we should use more mids :)
Shadowman para
Sriram [del]
I think it's crucial to switch between several tactics. Adjusting one tactic just a little bit each match will make you predictable, and easy to beat...
Sriram [del] para
borkos007
But only three of those mids are worth using.
Ishida really can't be trusted, he gives the ball away far too easily. And Ozbey can play attack, so we're left with Hudap, Veart and Murphy.
Ishida really can't be trusted, he gives the ball away far too easily. And Ozbey can play attack, so we're left with Hudap, Veart and Murphy.
Sriram [del] para
Shadowman
Yes, we can switch between several tactics, but I'm a fan of retaining that particular formation.
You have to undertand that we have a really stretched squad, and don't have quality reserve players who we can trust to be quality on the field.
(editado)
You have to undertand that we have a really stretched squad, and don't have quality reserve players who we can trust to be quality on the field.
(editado)
borkos007 para
Sriram [del]
Murphy is for sure the best :]
But he is bad placed, my fault :/
Ishida - :)
Ozbey and Hudap - both nice
Vaert - for sure he has a place in NT
IMO:
Vaert
Murphy
Ishida
And don't forget about Whitehouse
But he is bad placed, my fault :/
Ishida - :)
Ozbey and Hudap - both nice
Vaert - for sure he has a place in NT
IMO:
Vaert
Murphy
Ishida
And don't forget about Whitehouse
Sriram [del] para
borkos007
I'm not a fan of Ishida at all, his place is on the bench for me. Whitehouse lacks passing skills.
Cloete [del] para
borkos007
no way!! Hudap carved up tonight, while I think Ozbey woulda been good further up the field.
Also I think our defence should play further up, just so the gap between murphy + defence and the midfield is alot smaller. Not play as high as an offside trap, but high enough to make alot of tackles before they get too clsoe to the box.
Also I think our defence should play further up, just so the gap between murphy + defence and the midfield is alot smaller. Not play as high as an offside trap, but high enough to make alot of tackles before they get too clsoe to the box.
borkos007 para
Sriram [del]
But he has good technique -> winger form bench :)
@Cloete
Imo we should change Murphy's place, or add another def-mid, he's too slow to get from one wing to another :s
@Cloete
Imo we should change Murphy's place, or add another def-mid, he's too slow to get from one wing to another :s
At least one good thing you can take from that match - you are definitely doing better than the previous coaches, who would probably have lost that by a lot more than what you did.