Asunto: [NT] opsant

among the members of our staff, this theory started a long discussion. I think opsant will tell you soon about it

sokker is not only a skill-game.
(fortunately...)

sokker is tactic, sokker is study, sokker is spending hours watching the opposite team last match, sokker is cerebral.

in sokker there are about 10-12 NT we can't face. polski, eesti, and so...
all the NTs with less than 700 users and more than 80 can be placed on the same level.

am I crazy? no. sokker isn't a skill-game, I said. If you know how to play, you can beat a stronger team.

I saw NT coaches of a lot of NT playing with a basic tactic; in the last WC only 10 NT were tactically ok.

I promise the best I can. My staff and I will spend a lot of time sawing opposite's tactics and making new ways to beat them. none, at these levels, works so hard.

match #1
match #2
these are two random exemples of right tactics, where I beated a stronger team.

here Magyarország strikes England, playing only on the tactic.

no need to speak.

Having stronger players is important, but... do you still think is the most important thing?

I'd like to add something.
It is strange you said something like that... New Zealand reached great results, expecially in terms of "beauty of the game", and I think this is merit of coach Seca, one of the greatest in this game, IMHO. :)

It is not a critic against you, is only what I think. :)

to both;

divine results in my opinion would be beating everyone, including Poland, which you have already excluded in your list of 12 countries you wouldn't expect to beat.

Great/wonderful results would be if you're a dab hand with tactics etc.

Hyperboles are ok, but divinity? Tch.

in sokker there are about 10-12 NT we can't face. polski, eesti

When I was Australia's coach I've beatem Poland and got 2 draws with Eesti. :P

But you paid there NT coaches for a win/draw ;)

Pff :P

greetings, borkos ;)
I think you were a great coach, but not for that match. you've beaten polska when polska played with jokers :D
your match was perfect, but you played against a weak team!

it isn't an attack to you, I consider you a good coach, as I said. many others made less than you with better teams, but your words gives more value at my ones.

my project is:
- spending hours to study opposite team and tactics
- create a community where everyone has his role
- helping Australian users in planning their trainings

I think none as well as my staff could promise so much hours of work.

isn't so?

but what made it god was, he got poland to play agaisnt us with that kind of team and with a good tactic allowed us to win, which got us a lot of points.

This is the kind of reason borkos was a great coach, he knew exactly how strong our NT was, its strengths and weaknesses and put us up against the hardest opponents he could beat (often high rank then us)

no problem, I said borkos is ok, but...
even my club team could beat that polska 5-0, and not only 1-0.
(editado)

Polska game example was just a little joke ;)
And with current players like Leijer, Thompson, Willis, Hirons, Croxall, Dreger etc it would be quite easy to get even 10 ;) In that game afair highest technique skill of att was really, really low believe me :))

And as Achmid said, it was mainly to improve the NT rank place then. And worked really good :))

of course :D

I worked hard to get together a good staff and this project.

I wanna know what you think about. I've still got no votes, and I don't understand why :D

thanks.

I think you've run a good campaign but you were always going to find it tough.

I imagine its predominantly the usual reasons.

1) Nobody in Australia had heard of you prior to the election. People are more likely to vote for someone they know.

2) The incumbent is quite popular with the community. Being friends with (and seeing a number face to face) of the more active members of the community helps.

great opsant you are the best !!!

I'll stay in this community, if you all want :)