Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Asunto: [NT Caretaker] Stevie
I try to hide things but every tactic needs to be made with what you play and what players you have. The rest is my secret. If you want to see some of my tactics then they are in my tactic NT Scotland in which steve currently has access to. They were created with the old selector.If you win than you will have them.Some of the tactics i use to this day in my team.
yoiu moving one square position and tactic is not same any more. so thats beaty of sokker its common practice to adapt a tactic to your opponent and make variation by position by depth of def line widenes of winbecks etc ... so sky is the limit
I respect to you want to hide your secrets, also i hope to see your tactics as a NT manager :P
I can't mate . Hands are tied due to the u27 tournament we have been in
We've been killed by injuries, with no luck at all . We play Moldova this week , I'll get a look at players during the week . Hopefully the injured players are back available, we pick from an u28 squad this time
We've been killed by injuries, with no luck at all . We play Moldova this week , I'll get a look at players during the week . Hopefully the injured players are back available, we pick from an u28 squad this time
Argentina
Current manager is alfrica have been selected for 1 season.
Last WC, at first match against Hungary, Argentina played 5-2-1(winger)-2(strikers) tactic, ant they lost 1-6 against their strong opposite. In this match Argentina had very bad defence behaviour also their attackers and winger couldn't opposite's strong defenders. Bad tactic hard lost to Argentina. Also bad defence tactic behaviour + strong Hungary players = Lost for Arge.
At the second match against Latvija, Argentina played winger tactic again and they changed winger side, libero's and defender's positions. Until 24.minutes Latvia was winning, at 24 Latvija got red card, this player was playing in the middle of defend. After red card Latvija played with 4 def all of rest of match. Argentina won easily 4-2. But this match said us, Argentina still wanted to play with winger and 2 strikers tactic, like Belgie. It means our opposites in the group E, like winger tactic we need to consider is hardly. If i were play against Arge, i would like to play like Latvija tactic, i liked it but this red card was unlucky.
At the third match against Colombia, Argentina had must win this match for qualify to R16, but they draw 1-1. Argentina changed their winger tactic and they played 5-4(mid)-1(striker), idk why they changed tactic, despite they need to win surely and they gave up their confirmed tactic which wasn't bad, but it's fail for them imo. Also until 68.minutes Argentina were losing and haven't change tactic, always they are playing with 1 tactic during match. If i were Arge manager, i would to change to tactic2 when i lose or draw, but anyway Argentina eliminated from WC on group stage with bad tactic and gameplay. Colombia and Argentina had same player strength imo.
After WC, they played 7 friendlys until today. They won easily with winger tactic against, Brasil and Moldova.
Against Espana, they get lost 4-3. It was an interesting match. Espana played 4 def and Argentina still continue with winger tactic and they were winning 3-0. At the late time of this match Argentina's defenders got stamina problems probably. Espana played winger and Arge def was 5. They ate 4 goals. Interesting. I can't make any comment for this match anymore i need to learn those teams players skills especially defenders and wingers.
Against Brasil, they get lost 1-2. Argentina played with winger, Brasil played 4 def. This match was going draw, when Brasil got red card. Even so Brasil scored and didn't eat goal when 10vs11, and Brasil won. After wathcing this match i thougt Argentina's winger tactic not good, and his coach has very mistakes to build their defence behaviour on their tactic.
Against Portugal, they get lost 1-2. This game looks like Brasil match, still using same tactic from Argentina and had many mistakes. I don't say anymore.
Against Azerbaycan, the get lose 2-6. One of Azerbaycan defender got red card at second minutes of match. And Azerbaycan won easily 10vs11. Argentina always play same tactic and they never use second tactic at the match. Also i like Azeybaycan's tactic as like i did against Belgie. They are really good countered both of them.
Against USA, this match is 0-0. USA played lower ranking than Argentina but Arge's teams even couldn't one goal. Arge had 6 shoots only during match.
alfrica is may be again NT manager for Argentina. If he would, we could win his tactics and Argentina's team. I believe we are better than them.
Current manager is alfrica have been selected for 1 season.
Last WC, at first match against Hungary, Argentina played 5-2-1(winger)-2(strikers) tactic, ant they lost 1-6 against their strong opposite. In this match Argentina had very bad defence behaviour also their attackers and winger couldn't opposite's strong defenders. Bad tactic hard lost to Argentina. Also bad defence tactic behaviour + strong Hungary players = Lost for Arge.
At the second match against Latvija, Argentina played winger tactic again and they changed winger side, libero's and defender's positions. Until 24.minutes Latvia was winning, at 24 Latvija got red card, this player was playing in the middle of defend. After red card Latvija played with 4 def all of rest of match. Argentina won easily 4-2. But this match said us, Argentina still wanted to play with winger and 2 strikers tactic, like Belgie. It means our opposites in the group E, like winger tactic we need to consider is hardly. If i were play against Arge, i would like to play like Latvija tactic, i liked it but this red card was unlucky.
At the third match against Colombia, Argentina had must win this match for qualify to R16, but they draw 1-1. Argentina changed their winger tactic and they played 5-4(mid)-1(striker), idk why they changed tactic, despite they need to win surely and they gave up their confirmed tactic which wasn't bad, but it's fail for them imo. Also until 68.minutes Argentina were losing and haven't change tactic, always they are playing with 1 tactic during match. If i were Arge manager, i would to change to tactic2 when i lose or draw, but anyway Argentina eliminated from WC on group stage with bad tactic and gameplay. Colombia and Argentina had same player strength imo.
After WC, they played 7 friendlys until today. They won easily with winger tactic against, Brasil and Moldova.
Against Espana, they get lost 4-3. It was an interesting match. Espana played 4 def and Argentina still continue with winger tactic and they were winning 3-0. At the late time of this match Argentina's defenders got stamina problems probably. Espana played winger and Arge def was 5. They ate 4 goals. Interesting. I can't make any comment for this match anymore i need to learn those teams players skills especially defenders and wingers.
Against Brasil, they get lost 1-2. Argentina played with winger, Brasil played 4 def. This match was going draw, when Brasil got red card. Even so Brasil scored and didn't eat goal when 10vs11, and Brasil won. After wathcing this match i thougt Argentina's winger tactic not good, and his coach has very mistakes to build their defence behaviour on their tactic.
Against Portugal, they get lost 1-2. This game looks like Brasil match, still using same tactic from Argentina and had many mistakes. I don't say anymore.
Against Azerbaycan, the get lose 2-6. One of Azerbaycan defender got red card at second minutes of match. And Azerbaycan won easily 10vs11. Argentina always play same tactic and they never use second tactic at the match. Also i like Azeybaycan's tactic as like i did against Belgie. They are really good countered both of them.
Against USA, this match is 0-0. USA played lower ranking than Argentina but Arge's teams even couldn't one goal. Arge had 6 shoots only during match.
alfrica is may be again NT manager for Argentina. If he would, we could win his tactics and Argentina's team. I believe we are better than them.
So you make these analyses... :) I like them.... but nowhere in your club i see international tactics in your matches??? Can you show a match with a tactic you think can manage international in your club?? We can make arcade if you want, dont mind result or mark, just to show, that you actually have an idea... :)??
What is the advantage and disadvantage of low vs high def??
What is the advantage and disadvantage of low vs high def??
But... if i get elected..... id love your analysis anytime :)
Yes i want to make arcade with you, i did advertisement you can accept me :)
Guatemala
Current manager is NH203 have been selected for 1 season.
Guatemala didn't play in WC, then i will consider their last 7 friendly matches. They won against Jamaica(81.placed team on the world), also had 2 draw against Crna Gora and Honduras.
Against Peru, they get lost 1-4. Guatemala used 5 defenders, but wingers of def were fron of the others and like playing libero position. Due to this defence behaviour they couldn't countered the Peru's atacker wingers. Guatemela used too 1 winger and also 1 striker. Peru played with 10 players due to inury after 47.minutes and at 79 they got red card, in finally Peru won this match 9v11. Guatemala looks like really outclassed against Peru which isn't elite team of sokker. Also i liked Peru's defence behaviour.
Against El Salvador, they get lost 1-2. Guatemala changed their tactic, they used 5-2-1(winger)-2(strikers) and this winger only one time play with ball after that will be goal. Between those two teams has really huge ranking difference and Gua's mids played innefective. They couldn't create so much chance against this low team.
Against England, they get lost 3-4. Guatemala played with same tactic like against Salvador. England strikers was very good, they did 3 goals with shoot out of penalty area, and this means Guatemala's goalkeeper not very good. Guatemala's winger play good, they scored 2 goals via winger.
Against Mexico, they get lost 1-2. Until 78.minutes this match was equal and after Mexico scored 2 goals in 2 minutes(1 goal from penalty). This Guatemala 5-2-1-2. Prob they think its the way to play this tactic for their team. It looks kinda working sometimes but sometimes they lost hard. Depends on the opponents mids and defenders.
Guatemala looks like continue with their current NT manager, NH203.
Current manager is NH203 have been selected for 1 season.
Guatemala didn't play in WC, then i will consider their last 7 friendly matches. They won against Jamaica(81.placed team on the world), also had 2 draw against Crna Gora and Honduras.
Against Peru, they get lost 1-4. Guatemala used 5 defenders, but wingers of def were fron of the others and like playing libero position. Due to this defence behaviour they couldn't countered the Peru's atacker wingers. Guatemela used too 1 winger and also 1 striker. Peru played with 10 players due to inury after 47.minutes and at 79 they got red card, in finally Peru won this match 9v11. Guatemala looks like really outclassed against Peru which isn't elite team of sokker. Also i liked Peru's defence behaviour.
Against El Salvador, they get lost 1-2. Guatemala changed their tactic, they used 5-2-1(winger)-2(strikers) and this winger only one time play with ball after that will be goal. Between those two teams has really huge ranking difference and Gua's mids played innefective. They couldn't create so much chance against this low team.
Against England, they get lost 3-4. Guatemala played with same tactic like against Salvador. England strikers was very good, they did 3 goals with shoot out of penalty area, and this means Guatemala's goalkeeper not very good. Guatemala's winger play good, they scored 2 goals via winger.
Against Mexico, they get lost 1-2. Until 78.minutes this match was equal and after Mexico scored 2 goals in 2 minutes(1 goal from penalty). This Guatemala 5-2-1-2. Prob they think its the way to play this tactic for their team. It looks kinda working sometimes but sometimes they lost hard. Depends on the opponents mids and defenders.
Guatemala looks like continue with their current NT manager, NH203.
Last updates (late answers from skmail sent) :
Gary White, age: 29
Alex MacManus, age: 29
Gary White, age: 29
Alex MacManus, age: 29