Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Asunto: Barclays Premier League 2010-11
Another big decision favouring the mancs. Neville not being sent off and wba not getting a penalty
being a Man U fan i have to agree that should of been a penalty, Neville should never be playing for Man U anymore, he is useless, slow, rarely gets good tackles. Hate him, mind you, that Fabio aint much better with the tackles he doesn :/
finally.. rooney's score again..plus an assist for chicharito :D
because he wasnt, it came off the bolton defender. If you're on about cole's goal that is
:P
thank you astonp, you saved me explaining it. It bounced off Elmander rather than Rodriguez.
thank you astonp, you saved me explaining it. It bounced off Elmander rather than Rodriguez.
bouncing off isn't changing a possible offside position :)
exactly
the moment Torres touched the ball Cole was offside and took part in the action = offside goal
the moment Torres touched the ball Cole was offside and took part in the action = offside goal
no, but he cant be given offside because it came off an opposition player, similar to intercepting a back pass
bouncing off isnt a pass.
I havent seen the match, so dont know what the situation is.
If I'm offside, and some defender cant control/stop a ball from one of my teammates and I get it, it's offside ...
I havent seen the match, so dont know what the situation is.
If I'm offside, and some defender cant control/stop a ball from one of my teammates and I get it, it's offside ...
I was sure that Torres did touch it, will check it later.
doesnt matter, he wasnt offside when the last liverpool player touched the ball. He was when it hit the opposition player, therefore not offside
Actually, if the defender doesn't successfully control the ball, then the player would still be offside. This happens in sokker as well.