Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Asunto: Barclays Premier League 2010-11

2011-02-21 13:36:29
yeah, but how much did they all cost?

Man U have bought success, always have apart from that one generation and always will do
2011-02-21 14:31:43
we haven't bought success...you tell us how we have bought success? We dont have the millions chelsea and man city have. We buy them in cheap, train them up and wala....
2011-02-21 14:51:47
Lol. Check out how much you payed for players before you say such thing.

Evra 6m pounds
Ferdinand 30m pounds
Vidic 7m pounds
Hargreaves 18m pounds
Carrick 10m pounds
Anderson 30m euro
Nani 26m euro
Valencia 16m pounds
Berba 31m pounds
Rooney 26M pounds
Bebe 9m pounds [lol!]

these is your 'cheap'?
(editado)
2011-02-21 15:03:36
yip
2011-02-21 15:06:49
but man city/real madrid will spend that in probably two/three times less time than us
(editado)
2011-02-21 15:13:30
doesn't matter
and Chelsea spent about as much as you did before singing Torres

2011-02-21 15:25:55
Man U fans are deluded. Of those players:
Evra = Bargain
Ferdinand = Overpriced
Vidic = Bargain
Hargreaves = WORST £18M EVER
Carrick = That was actually £18.6m. Terribly overpriced
Anderson = STUPIDLY overpriced
Nani = Yet to show he's worth that (shouldn't be too long though)
Valencia = Overpriced
Berbatov = VEEEEEERY overpriced
Rooney = Overpriced
Bebe = ULTIMATE FAIL. HE IS BULL
2011-02-21 15:34:06
Yes and you'll probably buy 2/3 times more players that never make it and are complete crap.
2011-02-21 15:37:55
Obertan and Bebe were absolutely crap against a NON-LEAGUE team. That is an indication of their quality.

Man U spent £10m on them. Fergie's empire is crumbling...
2011-02-21 18:23:52
Obertan was one of our best players yesterday
2011-02-21 19:12:31
Now. Make a list showing the Arsenal first XI. I think I read somewhere(not sure if its right or not) but Chelsea spends 50 on 1 player while Wenger would have been able to buy 10 players for that money.
2011-02-21 19:16:26
still non-league standard so just shows how crap the rest of them were.

Look at how much the barca aquad cost as well
2011-02-21 21:13:20
while Wenger would have been able to buy 10 players for that money.

Yeah, Wenger is having great bargains, like Eboue , or Toure bout for less than 500K, but he paid a lot for Walcott ~16M and also a big deal for Arshavin, but mostly he is having bargains...
2011-02-21 22:13:50
Starting XI Transfers

Now,you can call me biased being an Arsenal fan and referring to an Arsenal blog, but it does quite well reflect the status of transfers. For the most part, big name clubs do not care about developing players but rather take the easy way and just buy your talent......

2011-02-21 22:17:33
+1
2011-02-21 23:16:49
yes but look at the time difference, man you have bought that over 5+ years. Man city have done that in just over 1 year.