Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Asunto: »[info]Dev Diary #82: Automatic release of NT-players from
I just hope the match viewing issue is not added to the priority list.
SAID IN "Development Diary No. 71 - Financial Reform: First Step" (you can see it in their "PRESS ROOMS", penultimate announcement.
"You can see that the increase in player salaries, depending on the level of the league, is in the range of 15% to 33%, which should translate to an increase in general operating expenses of a few to a dozen. percent."
If cecil yesterday earned EXACTLY 35,075...... And to that we add the 33% MAXIMUM THAT THEY PROMISED, his new salary would be 46,550 TO BE EXACT.
THEN WHY NOW CECIL CHARGES 52,475???!!!
And so with EACH OF MY PLAYERS, I just made the conversion of the 4 most expensive and NONE of them respect that 33% of MAXIMUM, which, I repeat, IS WRITTEN IN AD Nº 71
WE HAVE FACTS THAT DO NOT MATCH YOUR ESTIMATES OR STATEMENTS.
"You can see that the increase in player salaries, depending on the level of the league, is in the range of 15% to 33%, which should translate to an increase in general operating expenses of a few to a dozen. percent."
If cecil yesterday earned EXACTLY 35,075...... And to that we add the 33% MAXIMUM THAT THEY PROMISED, his new salary would be 46,550 TO BE EXACT.
THEN WHY NOW CECIL CHARGES 52,475???!!!
And so with EACH OF MY PLAYERS, I just made the conversion of the 4 most expensive and NONE of them respect that 33% of MAXIMUM, which, I repeat, IS WRITTEN IN AD Nº 71
WE HAVE FACTS THAT DO NOT MATCH YOUR ESTIMATES OR STATEMENTS.
constantly killing from 3 years, but it still standing. Sokker is tough bastard:)
and what about 2D Viewer ?
many users cant watch our games since Thursday.
: S
and what about 2D Viewer ?
many users cant watch our games since Thursday.
: S
We will check 2d viewer soon.
Our estimation was made only for wages algoritm change, and it is an avarage change for total club cost.
You need to remember, that on top of our change is always typical wages update, linked to your players development and training. That is why total change can be higher than 15-33% for all club wages. But only that range is connected with our update, rest of change is training.
Our estimation was made only for wages algoritm change, and it is an avarage change for total club cost.
You need to remember, that on top of our change is always typical wages update, linked to your players development and training. That is why total change can be higher than 15-33% for all club wages. But only that range is connected with our update, rest of change is training.
Oh, boy. Sokker is becoming decadent, really... It looks like changes are been parcially maid so eventually all users stop paying plus so they can start the player base from zero.
This is madness. And Raul is pretending these changes will be good.
And also Raul thinks the frequency and máx length for injuries are ok. I think you are playing a differente game, my friend.
This is madness. And Raul is pretending these changes will be good.
And also Raul thinks the frequency and máx length for injuries are ok. I think you are playing a differente game, my friend.
You should have made a gradual increase so that it is not such a hard hit on the team's economy.
You should have removed the buff players get per skill buff this season only, and left the buff 15-33% like you did in testing.
I congratulate you for the intention of maintaining and raising the level of sokker, but as an entrepreneur you have a lot to do, you must attract clients, not drive them away.
Many of us who are here continue for the love of the game but everything has a limit, don't look for you to be left alone, listen to us the sokker is yours but without us it is nothing.
You should have removed the buff players get per skill buff this season only, and left the buff 15-33% like you did in testing.
I congratulate you for the intention of maintaining and raising the level of sokker, but as an entrepreneur you have a lot to do, you must attract clients, not drive them away.
Many of us who are here continue for the love of the game but everything has a limit, don't look for you to be left alone, listen to us the sokker is yours but without us it is nothing.
i have 33 y old player that has increased on 39% so @raul something is wrong with your math...
on top this high wages will be paid the whole season despite he drops ...
You should have removed the buff players get per skill buff this season only, and left the buff 15-33% like you did in testing.
I looks to me that the results match what they had in testing. It's about total wage increase in a team, not about "the highest wage increase out of all players in a team". Some players will earn much more, some not (goalkeepers, younger players without high skills, old players who lost some of their skills last season).
Ekstraklasa teams wage increase (in Polish currency):
34.25% if you look at sums of all wages before and after and calculate the increase this way, or 33.78% if you first sum all % increases in teams and then take the average of them.
And of course when they say "Average increase in Ekstraklasa will be 33%" then for some teams in Ekstraklasa it will be higher than that number, and for other teams it will be lower, as you can see in my table.
I looks to me that the results match what they had in testing. It's about total wage increase in a team, not about "the highest wage increase out of all players in a team". Some players will earn much more, some not (goalkeepers, younger players without high skills, old players who lost some of their skills last season).
Ekstraklasa teams wage increase (in Polish currency):
34.25% if you look at sums of all wages before and after and calculate the increase this way, or 33.78% if you first sum all % increases in teams and then take the average of them.
And of course when they say "Average increase in Ekstraklasa will be 33%" then for some teams in Ekstraklasa it will be higher than that number, and for other teams it will be lower, as you can see in my table.
So I just checked the Ekstraklasa teams with wages increase below average %
It is always pretty much the same story. No training players. Almost exclusively players above 30yrs.
Those teams would usually pay less on players' wages after the update if there was no reform.
It is always pretty much the same story. No training players. Almost exclusively players above 30yrs.
Those teams would usually pay less on players' wages after the update if there was no reform.
And what's your point?
There are teams with only old players (and wages in these teams would go down without the reform)
There are teams with younger players (and wages in these teams would go up without the reform)
There are teams with mixed squad (which would have close to no wage change without the reform)
Looking at the average shows the average impact of reform on wages.
There are teams with only old players (and wages in these teams would go down without the reform)
There are teams with younger players (and wages in these teams would go up without the reform)
There are teams with mixed squad (which would have close to no wage change without the reform)
Looking at the average shows the average impact of reform on wages.
nevermind, I just tried to buy some top player for the first division, and got overbid by several users playing in the third division. Maybe this change won't be bad after all when the wages ruin budget of such teams.
could someone give more detail about problem with 2d viewer? it works for me, any specific browser?
I wrote here were the problem is, downloading anything from files.sokker.org takes a long time (or doesn't work at all), for me it's ALWAYS ~15.3 seconds for some small files like this .css I linked there, and for 3D viewer - https://files.sokker.org/viewer-3d/ it returns 522 from cloudflare.