Asunto: »[info]Dev Diary #82: Automatic release of NT-players from

And what would you propose to change exactly with "age" in youth school? -1 age? That would create crazy players, monsters.

It's simple bere real academy change simple fix the incoming youth to not be possible to reach age 20 Wich means reduce starting age ..

No, it's not simple, it's simplistic

More better players then? Sure, that seems like perfect solution ;)
We would \rather reduce number of juniors generated per each week and add an option for higher skill draw for juniors with age 19+

maximum weeks of a juvenile in school: 26 weeks

free in the draw to juniors 18+ in skills
I prefer crooked juniors, and it's probably not a problem to do it already
(editado)

Yes, reducing junior time in YS can be one of possible solution.

We would \rather reduce number of juniors generated per each week

have you seen the transfer list lately? there's a total emptiness, this game needs more MEDIUM level youths, not less youths in general....

this is how my ys looks like, I leave everyone who I can, but it's hard to keep even 10 youths... half of them are worthless anyway

Bohdan Kuśmienny 17 adequate [6] outfield 5
Tomasz Roztworowski 19 outstanding [12] outfield 8
Ziemowit Papciak 19 incredible [13] outfield 9
Norbert Koenig 17 average [5] outfield 12
Karol Sulikowski 17 very good [9] outfield 13
Wawrzyniec Studzinski 16 average [5] outfield 14
Jarostryj Kuzera 17 average [5] outfield 17
Bruno Muskietorz 18 solid [8] outfield 19
Leonard Rycerz 17 adequate [6] outfield 28
Paweł Wenowaty 18 weak [4] GK 34

I do not mind if incoming juniors are reduced to 4 even 3 but to have some quality. Now all is crap..

+1

Sure, but we can improve quality only if we will reduce number of juniors. If YS gets around 40 juniors per season that means that most of them need to be sacked.

Raul, from where everyone playing this game is supposed to obtain squad depth for increased amount of games if the number of incoming and trained players stays the same as it was when we had 1 game per week and everyone could get by having 12-14 players because there were less injuries? There is a finite amount of players that was balanced around having less games.

@raul Why this fear to have good players?
The fastest way new teams to reach top teams is they have fast way to obtain such .
Sokker should be about tactics

I fully agree that sokker should be about tactics (or tactics should be an important part of your performance).

I just belive that it is much better for your tactical possibilities, when there will be some weakness to take advantage of in both players line up - currently best teams are using players with max skill levels, what is the point to face 2x superdevine DEF vs 3x Superdevine ATT?

I dont get why you are so attached to so good players - if we will reduce global level of players it will be the same situation for everyone, so it is not affecting to competition level, but will bring on new tactical solutions. I think that some of you remeber sokker from its begginings, games where much more interesting before age of multi-devine players appeared.

Yep but much engine is crap with weak players..

i know, but fixing player will take years, i belive that even with our speed ME would be possible to improve it faster.
With 4 seasons per year we will see still many multidevine players in next three years at least, even if we will reduce level of new players somehow.