Asunto: »[info] Dev Diary 79: Coaches' retirements and conditiona

Max settings in all skills is the best to do even to get only brillant or magical coaches ?

I was looking for unearthly, but this brilliant is almost perfect for assistant

in general though when I look for [14]/[15] I set everything max and goalkeeper as min

Thanks Borkos. You are brillant, just like the coach you just hired.

And I’m even younger than him!

I always set everything on unearthly, including keeper. Rhat way, the chance of you pulling a very good magical is tons higher than setting everything except GK on unearthly.
Btw...I think GK trainers may be set way cheaper! Why having a trainer having his wage grown exponentionally when he has GK skill? It's not profidable anymore. GK are worthless on TL.

it's impossible to set anything on unearthly

I don’t see a point in getting a magical though, brilliant is max for assistant for me, for main & youth I want unearthly

Sorry, but it is true, you/they( sokker ) do never listen to the users.
Pitty, because we know al lot about the game, years and years of experience every day of the week.
(editado)

it's impossible to set anything on unearthly

I mean...on max...It's also a very stupid system where you can select divine and tragic, but the sytem changes it to magical and unsatisfactory...

In my opinion, it's a mistake that the system for recruiting coaches is randomized. I've never understood why we get to select skills first and then have to accept randomized results. It's fine with the decimals being randomized, but if I'm willing to pay the wage of a high-end coach, I should be able to get one. Just raise the wage instead or make me pay a fixed one-time sign on fee depending on the kind of coach I want.

The problem is the users don’t always know what’s best for the game. They know what’s best from an individual perspective and maybe that becomes a collective of people by it still doesn’t mean it’s best for the game overall.

I do think that developments should be mixed between what the developers want and what the users want mind you as it does give a more balanced approach.

Yeah it’s an interesting one. I’ve wondered whether it was two fold. One to force more money out of the system (money sink) and one to kind of simulate real life in that a coach you want might not be available when you need them.

I’d be ok with a higher one time cost but better accuracy with what I want. However, realistically if they did this they’d just set it to the same price it would take on average to get to the same result. That would mean it would be better for some and worse for others but on average the same as the current system. The benefit though is that everyone is treated the same rather than some luckier than others.

Yes, it should be a mix indeed.
But now it isnt.
They follow their own way and do not look at long term problems.
Most important is the lack of good communication and not looking at making the game more competitive ( it is even worse in the last seasons), that is my opinion.

There should be tax for People that have a lot of money on their bank account, this kills the game.
There should be more changes that hit rich managers instead of new users.
I am a rich manager, so this is not from my own perspective but to save this game.
With the current short term changes, there will be no newcomers that will stay for a long time.
(editado)

I disagree that this change will result in less new users staying. The issue is that newer users aren’t joining because this type of game is not what most are seeking for entertainment. It’s an outdated form of entertainment. This change actually works in favour for new users anyway who don’t go straight to 5x unearthly coaches.

These changes are designed to take money out of the game which is a good thing for new users too (we can debate whether they’re effective or not). We also know there is work being done to improve initial players situations as well.

Rich managers are not a problem for the game. In fact they (we) limit the inflation by keeping money off the market ;-)

Why does it bother you that someone has money on his account and doesn’t use it, just trains players for fun? Where exactly do you see a problem with that?

You want to force people into playing for results, when they obviously don’t want to do that?

Borkos are you saying the difference between 3 x Unearthly assistants & 3 x Brilliant is small, how small? i thought the difference between 2 unearthly and 1 magical assistant vs 3 x Unearthly is tiny, but how tiny? say 0.33% or 1%?
(editado)