Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Asunto: »[change] 5 Substitutions

2022-08-17 21:20:21
ME change is super urgent.
The rest is recommended
2022-08-17 21:23:58
seriously don't understand why people need 5 subs or more players on bench

maybe in a top NT it would be useful, but at club level? almost nobody has even 2 decent subs that he wants to enter on the pitch :D
2022-08-17 21:25:01
what about shit lvl teams that will utilize more subs? Especially those that do not have 11 stamina players?
2022-08-17 22:08:39
bad teams also have a stronger eleven than bench

people usually make 1, max 2 subs in a game, often because of training, not match ideas/issues...
2022-08-17 22:28:07
With 5 subs allowed you can still make 1 or 2. Noone forces you to make 5...
2022-08-17 22:39:06
- its to give proper time for trainees (if i want to add 30m per young trainee in official game)
- to avoid player with mid condition on bench to go on def positrion for example
- to cover up red cards properly and be able if i did 3 subs already i have a backup on bench to enter if injury
- to change players based on your second tactic

i can go on more but yes we need more slots on bench and more subs ///
2022-08-17 22:41:12
Basically to be tactically prepared, since the current system limits your tactical options.
2022-08-17 22:43:19
I know its an option

Im saying almost nobody uses even current 3 subs at the moment, so its not very needed, and definitely not the most important thing to do now
2022-08-17 22:45:33
Why don't they use 3 subs? Because it sets you empty when you have an injury after your last sub.
Like I said... ME is super urgent, the rest is recommended.
2022-08-17 23:25:28
Two reasons

- New training system
- The big shit problem with injuries the last 2 seasons
2022-08-18 01:00:26
They also don't use 2 subs or even 1...

People usually have much weaker subs than 1st team players and dont want to use them because why would they...

You can have even 15 bench spots but except for NT You wont fill them with good enough players

Another reason is that even with 5 subs if You bring your reserve mid from bench in '45 and then he gets injured - who comes in? Your midfielder number...5 assuming You have 3 starting mids. What kind of quality will 5th MID have?

Its a nice idea in theory, in practice IMO it will be a dead change, wont have any impact
2022-08-18 01:03:25
I just checked Your games and sviktorovs games

If You Play with 1st team, You make 0 changes

Both of You make changes only for training purposes

Yet You say that its important to implement 5 changes, even though You normalny don't use even one...what for do You need 5 changes, to bring 5 youths from bench in league games thay You throw away because of training?
(editado)
2022-08-18 02:19:25
Talk for yourself. 5 subs is more than needed. It gives the game much more sense and tactical moves. You don't have to use subs if you don't want and if you can't understand the benefits of resting your players. 7 slots and 5 subs sounds more than good to avoid situations where you already have 3 subs made and you get an injury after that.
2022-08-18 02:59:50
I get borkos point, no one have 16 A team players, so no one is going to use this change for competitive reassons, maybe for training it could be a good feature but not urgent as you guys said, i think that if the change is made its OK and it wouldn’t get any negative result, but i don’t think is a crucial thing that need to change NOW with urgency.
Just my opinion :)
2022-08-18 03:43:40
I reduced the squad due season was long ago over but if you want to compete I will need few more good subs and then will need more subs... I did 3 subs by 45m that's risky...
2022-08-18 08:35:37
Next time before responding try understanding what I wrote