Asunto: »[change] 5 Substitutions

Next time before responding try understanding what I wrote

It will always be risky

If You have a good def sub will you use nim or keep him on bench? What if another def gets injured so another def, much weaker will also enter the pitch?

Will people have enough money for first team and 7 or 9 subs? No they wont, look at the prices...people struggle to have a decent bench even with current one, let alone having 2 extra defs, 2 extra mids and 2 extra atts at high level...

Yep, this. There needs to be an increase in training spots of some kind before talks about bigger rosters. And changes in ME and/or stamina - to force using of subs before this.
(editado)

With this ratio of injuries and frequency we need at least 1 good player on the bench to enter that's 4 slots . With possibility to train you need 3 more slots so to have trainee to enter sub for training but to enter with proper order not accidentally by injury ...

Hope you got my point ....

Why not having 16 main guys in your squad, it's purely up to the manager to decide how to beat the opponents. And it's a crucial thing with more games per week + injuries + bookings.

So as I've said...you want more bench places and subs only for training purposes, not tactical etc. need...

@silvercard
you're new here and playing at low level, sorry but you don't really know what it means financially and how hard it's to build a decent squad, that's why you don't realise how ridiculous your take 'why not have 16 main guys" sounds like

Haha again, talk for yourself mate. I would gladly use 5 subs and if not maybe another manager will. Are you afraid of competition on tactical level?

What ifs bla bla. In football now a days tell me, how many subs are allowed in official game? I think it's reasonable and a very good add on to make the game even more intriguing.

Every manager can decide if they trade on the market or they will train their young players or they combine with young and old etc... There are many ways now to manage your team. 5 subs will bring more tactical vision to the game and it's only good for the game.

If you don't like it it's your right, and you can Co tinue playing with no subs at all, what will it change for you? ;)

Are you afraid of competition on tactical level?

XD

that's my full comment on your nonsense

Maybe you need to think a bit out of the box then?

What about training 11 guys and getting decent couple of subs?

Or sell your squad and adjust it to get 13- 15decent players, all comes back to financial management.

I am new here so I can't have an opinion, bravo :D
(editado)

What about training 11 guys

xDDD

Or sell your squad and adjust it to get 13- 15decent players

xDDDDDDD

please, play, get some experience other than playing bots with rating 25, then pour your wisdom on us
(editado)

You can train a maximum of 10 players (forget about formation training for anyone remotely trainable). Which is the main reason why big squads are basically unviable in the long term as you cant train them all and are forced to have 28y+ players who lose value and skills each week.

Man you're just pushing your opinion to the others instead of voting for a yes or no. And literally all your arguments are related to your team situation. We're here talking about sokker as a game not about how many users are in Estonia playing this game.

Big boy talk, you can keep it for yourself.

My team is mainly composed of young players which was my decision to go and play a season in lower tier. Maybe you cannot afford it at your level or can you? XD

You went literally completely off topic, because somebody just found answers to your arguments.

Back to the topic. So you would say no to 5 subs proposal because you cannot afford to have a bench?

And literally all your arguments are related to your team situation.

completely the opposite, what I write has zero relation to my team situation, I don't really care about my team at the moment, except for training :-D

Back to the topic. So you would say no to 5 subs proposal because you cannot afford to have a bench?

it's not about me, it's about the game at higher level than newbie 3rd Eesti league, as Xineon explained to you

the problem is you have very little knowledge about this game at serious level and yet you think that you know better

that's why you don't know how ridiculous some things that you write sound like

Exactly, agree here. However to just increase subs number is reasonable just to rotate the team for training and of course everybody can decide in which way they use the subs.

Like now, some. Managers use all the subs, some of us none. But having the opportunity to cover 5 players per game is good in case of injuries and for tactical changes.

Lol Mr fight K.O you win haha. Congrats! Never listen to anyone, you're the best man. Take care :D

have fun tactically destroying 25 rating bots with substitutions