Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Asunto: »[change] 5 Substitutions
Faannnyyyy para
Dtox9
3 forces you to maximally use 2 to have an injury sub ready...
Also... 5 spots forces you to choose which order gets the 2nd sub
1 GK, 1 DEF, 2 MID, 1 ATT
But that also means that IF you have a sub planned for a def or striker position and you have an injury for a def or striker, you are screwed!
This is 100% true, I am also making 2 changes usually for giving more minutes to my trainee in function of the current match outcome. Sometime I am scheduling three changes and I am in stress al the day due to possible injuries and different player entering in strange positions, loosing their previous training.
+1 to the idea
Also... 5 spots forces you to choose which order gets the 2nd sub
1 GK, 1 DEF, 2 MID, 1 ATT
But that also means that IF you have a sub planned for a def or striker position and you have an injury for a def or striker, you are screwed!
This is 100% true, I am also making 2 changes usually for giving more minutes to my trainee in function of the current match outcome. Sometime I am scheduling three changes and I am in stress al the day due to possible injuries and different player entering in strange positions, loosing their previous training.
+1 to the idea
borkos007 para
Faannnyyyy
entering in strange positions, loosing their previous training.
it doesn't work that way anymore
you can play as DEF, then MID, then ATT and have training set as DEF, the player will receive normal training
it doesn't work that way anymore
you can play as DEF, then MID, then ATT and have training set as DEF, the player will receive normal training
Nitpicking edit, but it will not always be normal. It will be still a distinction between friendly and/or official game :)
It will be normal, you will never 'lose' training as he wrote...
whether he gets 50%, 85% or 98% depends on how many minutes you decide to give him in what game, so it has nothing to do with 'unwanted substitution with wrong order'...
whether he gets 50%, 85% or 98% depends on how many minutes you decide to give him in what game, so it has nothing to do with 'unwanted substitution with wrong order'...
'unwanted substitution with wrong order' may still be a thing if You want to get advanced training coefficient close to max.
In example player who played 90 minutes in friendly that is expected to get some playtime in Wednesday match. That player were expected to substitute in XX minute on XYZ position, however due to injuries/previous subs will be forced to substitute in XX-YY minute on position ABC.
In example player who played 90 minutes in friendly that is expected to get some playtime in Wednesday match. That player were expected to substitute in XX minute on XYZ position, however due to injuries/previous subs will be forced to substitute in XX-YY minute on position ABC.
kryminator para
mangol
It won't be a problem because after training changes, it will not cancel player training entirely
mangol para
kryminator
I wrote about increasing advanced training coefficient not about cancelling in ;)
kryminator para
mangol
I know, but situation you described is simply normal and expected.
The possibility of training loss due to unwanted substitution during a match is no more, player will get training according to minures played on position which is set for him on training setup page.
The possibility of training loss due to unwanted substitution during a match is no more, player will get training according to minures played on position which is set for him on training setup page.
mangol para
kryminator
The whole point of this topic and discussion is "should it be normal and expected"...
silvercard21 para
mangol
No wonder why the game is so dead, if sokker has ''so talented borkos007 '' who has all answers to deny the initial idea in this topic... Man wake up, you'll always have something negative to say about number of subs. Moreover, it's pretty bad advertisement to be like this and deny all ideas that the COMMUNITY has. Majority who have voted, have voted for currently. End of story, we know you dislike it, we got it :D
borkos007 para
silvercard21
Try reading before writing
I wasn't saying anything about my opinion about the proposed changes this time
I was replying to this
entering in strange positions, loosing their previous training.
this is 100% not true and that's all I wrote
stop being toxic
as for my opinion, I didn't write that I don't want more changes, they can even give you 20 changes, I don't care
all I wrote is that I personally don't see the point because most people don't use even 3 or 2 changes during their games because their subs are bad, thus it's a change only for training reasons
there are many, many more important things right now that need to be addressed
(editado)
I wasn't saying anything about my opinion about the proposed changes this time
I was replying to this
entering in strange positions, loosing their previous training.
this is 100% not true and that's all I wrote
stop being toxic
as for my opinion, I didn't write that I don't want more changes, they can even give you 20 changes, I don't care
all I wrote is that I personally don't see the point because most people don't use even 3 or 2 changes during their games because their subs are bad, thus it's a change only for training reasons
there are many, many more important things right now that need to be addressed
(editado)
jacktheripper para
zakraw
+1
In real soccer there are 5 substitutions, now why not on sokker?
Also, now i training 6 youngs for match 45 minutes, insteas with 5 sub i could train 10 for match...it's convenient...
In real soccer there are 5 substitutions, now why not on sokker?
Also, now i training 6 youngs for match 45 minutes, insteas with 5 sub i could train 10 for match...it's convenient...