Asunto: [info] Training issue - solutions

I don't see even one 16-17yo player in your team and that's what we're talking about.

Of course they've got older in the meantime!

But no matter what I write here, only you and your ilk are the very best, everyone else is stupid and has no idea, right?

Let's leave it at that, because I won't get any real or at least conditional approval here anyway, after all you and your elite football experts are the absolute football cracks and everyone else is no good, so they're just so-called extras here!

I hereby take my leave of this international know-it-all forum and have absolutely no more fun taking part in it, after all I am not accountable to anyone here and have to declare my opinion here at a low level!

Admire each other in future and leave me out of it, it's better that way, because I have absolutely no need for that

Arrivederci!!!

1) it was about 16/17 yo trainees. So borkos clearly made a point here.

2) you are not playing with 16/17 yo players.

3) Even last season, when you finished 1st in 3rd division, you played only with one 16/17 yo player against me. And my average rating was somthing around 35-40, while you had 55-60.

4) you may play competitive in lower league (3rd level) with few 16/17 yo trainees, but won't manage it in 2nd Bundesliga. And that is what this discussion is about here. No need to oppone anybody.

And I didn't say that I only played with 16- and 17-year-old players.
I wrote about trainees, regardless of their age!

Read my text properly before you take someone's side!!!
(editado)

It doesn't matter what you wrote about, the whole discussion was about extra training for 16-17yo players and possibility to play for results at higher level while using 16-17yo players. Not 20, not 21 or 22yo players and not one 16yo player.

So you were simply completely off-topic in this discussion.

PS. please chill out, you're extremely agitated every time you appear on the forum (of a stupid game). Not healthy.

I read your text. And yes, you did not write about 16/17yo trainees. But you gave your statement (one can do a lot with strategic adaptions, which most of us here certainly support) in the context of an ongoing discussion about 16/17yo trainees.

And that context made your comment either not fitting or missleading and wrong.
(editado)

That was a general comment from me, regardless of the age of the trainees!
Ultimately, I would of course also do this with talented 16 and 17-year-olds and I guarantee that they would be successful, as long as they can fulfil the minimum requirements for the respective field positions of my tactical game specifications!!!
And this statement is by no means misleading!!!l!!!
(editado)