Asunto: NT injuries - voting

you tell my why, as i see most users is voting for third option.

Coz it is in contradiction to all the stuff that was written in other threads by You.
Also this is only way for guys dedicated to training smaller NT players to benefit in one way or another from it

it is really simple.

option one - no pain, no gain.
option two - injuries and some advantages. But lest be serious, we cant make it too strong either. We can make injuries in NT shorter, pay back wages of injuried player, but still - we cant make it too powerfull in terms to competite with clubs without NT players.

Paying like 5m euro in case that your player get an injury is nonsence to, i would buy few NT players just to count on nice bonuses from time to time :)

Actually, it depends. If you're playing for a promotion/championship you can pay even that much :P But I totally agree, it's not the best option to add more money to the market.

I believe, that our best option is to maintain injuries in NT games (perhaps we should shorten them a bit), but only if the player's owner has the final word on whether his player is available for NT games. If he is ready to risk his player's health to get benefits, all good. Otherwise, his player should not be included in NT.

Nobody wants to send their player skills to the national team coach because they are right, they don't want their players injured.

I'm quite sure most users do send the skills, even with the risk of injury. I'm always proud if a player has NT matches. An injury from NT is sad, but in the end it's just a game, and it doesn't affect me in RL.

Maybe training bonus for NT should be bigger,
for example in club player playing 2x per week official game can have 100% efficiency if he also plays full match in NT he can do 140% efficiency (120% for one half of NT match)

that is something we want to avoid - in that way users with NT players will get to much advance vs rest.
injury can be recempensed, but it cant be overpayed.

i wish more users who think like you

that is something we want to avoid - in that way users with NT players will get to much advance vs rest.
injury can be recempensed, but it cant be overpayed.


That's why it's worth reducing the percentages in training, for two official league matches you have 100% training, what about a friendly match, CC and on top of that an NT/U21 match.
What's the point of playing these last 3 games when you already have 100% after 2 games :)

hmm. Maybe RESULTS.

"you tell my why, as i see most users is voting for third option. "

Because 80 % of people focus on personal benefits, if they have to vote, unless someone puts their focus on their fears.
Exactly like in elections in real life... ;P

.
(editado)

how many % of efficiency is now for official NT match?
it can be 10-15% but over 100%, but there should be something
(editado)

hmm. Maybe RESULTS.

And what's the benefit to me of playing for results in Ireland, explain it to me please.... I get 50k € more from sponsors?

i voted for 3 but im not satisfied with it ! so this definitely means that poll is not complete at least the poll needed at least "other" option so you can see that you actually do not have the "approval of community" ...

Paying like 5m euro in case that your player get an injury is nonsence to, i would buy few NT players just to count on nice bonuses from time to time :)
We cant give to strong benefits and make NT players to important - not everyone will have that kind of player.

Therefore, the second option is the best - definitely.

Any chance you would allow injured players get that base 50% of advanced training + the minutes they got before injury? That way injuries would at least affect training less and less users would be unsatisfied with them. You would still need reserves to put on the field, but at least you would lose less money/player value because of NT and especially U21 injury.

Jak bym wiedział że za uraz zawodnika będzie wypłacane 2x wynagrodzenie to bym zagłosował inaczej,i chyba nie tylko ja
;)