Asunto: Loan market

Impossible to find a way to introduce, forget the idea

If you're satisfied with a 50% efficiency, you can pick 2 players who will - in rotation - train one week on advanced at efficiency in the upper nineties, then another in the twenties in formation training. Average above 50% and you have 11 players training without all the hassle of depending on someone else's whims.

Whims like - putting your outfielder on goalkeeping training.

Or selling their youth and firing their coaches to save for the stadium.

Because of the above, you would definitely need to have a say about which team your player goes to, and he'll have to be recallable instantly as well (with a refund) if there was a loan system. But that wouldn't make it any less murky. It would allow capitalization on having influence on teams not looking to progress in the game (also referred to as fake).

Realistically, you could maybe try to justify the need for loans by the upheaval sprees of short injuries may cause: you get 2 goalies injured so what do you do? You buy 2 more and then for 3 weeks you're stuck with 4 and you either have to sell your usual performers or to manage the foursome. Such trouble is rare and it isn't big compared to finding those who would lend such players to you if they could sell them instead.

The market is plentiful enough, so where loans would make a difference would be in the shadier deals.

I never would get a loan player for my club. I wouldn't give my young players loan to another team. I like to coordinate my young players as I want and play with them MID, DEF or ATT instruction.

I don't feel this is good idea.

I could loan old player for my team if someone injure, but after then he would sit on the bench... I don't feel it would be good his owner...
If I loan a young player why would I train them, I train my juniors...